English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

That's a pretty bad legacy. How is that strong on terrorism? It is almost like the other side thinks they are invincible.... Do the Republicans really understand how much the world disagrees with them?

2007-01-23 10:56:29 · 6 answers · asked by Stop_the_Klan@yahoo.com 2 in News & Events Current Events

6 answers

Obama...Osama....let's call the whole thing OFF.

2007-01-23 10:59:00 · answer #1 · answered by $Sun King$ 7 · 0 0

who gives a **** what someones first name is, thats just ignorant. If it was up to barrack we would have never been in Iraq, somewhere we shouldnt have even been. weve lost more soldiers over there than on 9/11. Bush could have gotten osama, we knew where he was at, we sent the afghan militia after him, suprisingly they came back empty handed. i was in afghanistan for a year right next to those mountains, where he had his training camps. bush isnt tellin us everything, and he has alterior motives. we need osama

2007-01-27 18:58:54 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

With a name of Obama he won't get my vote , that is too close to Osama they might be brothers .
When they need Obama they will be looking for him at the same time they are looking for Osoma.

2007-01-23 19:01:58 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

They have em there just waiting till the end of his term and he will be remember as the one who caught osama

2007-01-23 19:05:02 · answer #4 · answered by Mechanical 6 · 0 0

Bottom line. Clinton let OBL go free when he had the chance to kill him.
People like yourself blame GWB and the republicans.

To someone, somewhere, that makes sense.

2007-01-23 19:49:38 · answer #5 · answered by dave b 6 · 0 0

they haven't got a clue.

2007-01-24 03:24:27 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers