I realise fraud may be a problem but it can be resolved. Perhaps a true reflection of what people actually think opposed to 'sexed' up figures that are published. Campaign strategy 'Lose the Lords'! ?
2007-01-23 10:03:54 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Further to that, you have an online bank account that you have total belief in as far as security is concerned. Yes, there are breaches, but that doesn't stop you does it? So solutions are the answer...online security. Devise a method instead of dissin' it because you have more pros than cons. Tax payers money is being wasted on idle thoughts for those that sit and snooze in the House of Lords on your hard earnings time. If ID cards become a reality, you would have had no choice in it so act now.
2007-01-23 10:33:45 · update #1
Yes I always said that the election should be more like the "X-factor" where we can phone in the vote.
2007-01-23 10:13:10 · answer #1 · answered by Not Ecky Boy 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
And how are you going to troubleshoot someones inability to connect to the internet site that does the voting?
How do you propose the inevitable denial of service attacks that will occur and prevent people from voting?
How will you stop someone from just hacking it?
How would you ask for ID online? and how would you verify it was that person?
These are just a few of the nightmares that would come along with online voting.
2007-01-23 10:17:33 · answer #2 · answered by sociald 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If I lose my workstation, I lose my link with my fiancee! properly, i does no longer lose email, because of the fact I even have blackberry, yet i could discover it very high priced phoning Canada each and all of the time, and that i could probably die if i could no longer see her on MSN frequently! the workstation has been had to reserving up our wedding ceremony and honeymoon arrangements so some distance... could have been so mcuh greater high priced by skill of telephone. SO please do no longer hack my workstation, or disable my connection, variety Mr invoice Gates, or you will disenchanted 2 young human beings very a lot!
2016-11-26 21:53:49 · answer #3 · answered by miceli 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
3% is wrong - and you set your argument up badly by using the word apparently. Not everyone has the internet, I know plenty of them - what do you live in a middle class bubble or something
2007-01-23 10:15:45 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
They should have a media blackout until the elections are over. It pisses me off when you have the news "projecting results" when there not all in. Just let the people go out and vote.
2007-01-23 10:08:50 · answer #5 · answered by sydb1967 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
"3% or perhaps more" - so that's somewhere between 3 and 100%, then.
2007-01-23 10:06:48 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Hell no. Your statement that fraud would be resolved is presumptous. Fraud would be inveitable.
2007-01-23 10:10:13 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
some people just don't fully think things through.
2007-01-23 10:08:06 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋