Would you rather fight it there in Iraq or here in our Homeland? Because one thing if for sure. There will be a fight. These Terrorist will not give up their desire to destroy us. So, do you want the bombs and weapons going off in your yard or over there!!!!
Those of you who call for Bush to stop the war are idiots. You are uneducated on the ways of these people and have no since of concern for the people of this country and our saftey. They will not stop trying to kill us. The only question is do you want to fight them there or here?
2007-01-23
09:29:17
·
12 answers
·
asked by
stephan s
3
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
some of you say Iraq has committed no act against us. well hells bells, they supported terrorist, they had training camps teaching people how to kill. They were Musilums of fundamental terroristic proportions which thrive is several mideastern countries.
2007-01-23
10:37:08 ·
update #1
Good question. Those who are opposed to the Iraq war are idiots.
2007-01-23 09:33:10
·
answer #1
·
answered by ? 5
·
1⤊
2⤋
You know, if it were not for unbridled American adventurism and BS foreign policy from the retard in the monkey suit presently peeling bananas in the oval office, the US would not be so hated in the Arab world as it is.
Clinton nearly brought the Palestinian problem to a close at the end of his tenure as President. He had Ehud Barak and Yaser Arafat in agreement on every point except the nature of Jerusalem and they were working through that even.
Then W is elected. He makes no effort whatsoever to mediate the Palestinian and Israeli conflict and basically casts a blind eye when Arial Sharon marched up the Temple Mount with armed guards, sparking the present intifada. It was only after the Israelis, with tacit approval and support from the Bush administration, started shooting Palestinian kids in the street did Al-Queda put their 9/11 plan into action. If you check the dates that the Al Queda sleepers began enrolling in flight schools, and contrast that with the politically deterioration in Israel, you will find congruence.
So then, Bush ignores the US' diplomatic priorities, defunds covert counter-terrorist operations that Clinton put into motion, changed the focus of the military budget from espionage and intelligence gathering to building the Star Wars missle defense system (which all experts agree will never work the way it is being marketed) and, all of a sudden, a bunch of hicks in the midwest freak out that disaster strikes home?
Go find yourself an education, my friend. As it is, you are grossly misinformed (the way most of you conservative bottom feeders tend to be) and your opinions, while echoing the distortions and misinformation of the head tard in charge of the White House, only serves to make you look like an imbecile of the first order.
2007-01-23 09:44:38
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Since when was Iraq going to attack the U.S?
The U.S. isn't fighting terrorism in Iraq, and the war there in no way safe-guards American society. The terrorists are still out there, and undoubtedly many of them are already in the U.S.
If you think that American soldiers fighting in Iraq are keeping America safe from anything, you're living a pipe-dream.
2007-01-23 09:50:38
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Iraq committed no terrorism against us.
By going to war against them we have angered Shiites and Sunnis. Who never committed terrorism against the US either.
Going after Al Qaeda was a different matter. They were the people who committed terrorism against the US.
Are we going to fight all of the Muslim world? What about the one's living in America?
Some sense needs to be applied here!!
2007-01-23 10:03:48
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
There were no terrorist in Iraq before Bush in his stupidity sent our troops there to die now it is full of them so who is to be blamed for the terrorists in Iraq? no other than Bush himself. He is to go down in American history as the most careless and selfish President ever.
2007-01-23 09:39:20
·
answer #5
·
answered by Koala 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
The so called terrorists in Iraq are basically Sunni extremists and Shiite extremists. Neither one of them are interested in fighting in the U.S. They are engaged in a civil war. The American people are not idiots because they aren't calling for Bush to stop a war that he can't stop which is a civil war in Iraq. The American people are rightfully calling for Bush to pull our troops out of IRaq so that they aren't engaged in Iraq's civil war. What part of that do you neo-cons not understand.
2007-01-23 09:35:23
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
You are asking liberals on what they think? They do not THINK - and that is the problem. They have "feelings" - which are not subject to reason. Their feelings tell them that giving food to the grizzly is "nice"- so they insist on doing it. And the argument that it teaches a wild animal where the food is- falls on deaf ears.
A liberal will not believe you until he sees his daughter stoned to death by muslim fanatics in central New York- and even then he will blame Bush.
2007-01-23 09:40:48
·
answer #7
·
answered by cp_scipiom 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
You need to rephrase the question. You should ask if we want the bombs and killings to take place in the back yards of Iraqi's or of Americans. If the answer is yes, then I would ask you to tell me when the Iraqi's agreed to be our proxies, to die instead of us?
2007-01-23 09:36:09
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Agreed......Idiots All....
911 was the first wave...it could very well have been 912-913-914 etc.....If we quit and run...we will definately be fighting somewhere on Main St, USA to some degree....
2007-01-23 09:38:56
·
answer #9
·
answered by PoliticallyIncorrect 4
·
0⤊
2⤋
YOU'VE DRANK TOO MUCH KOOLAID.
THE WAR OF CHOICE WAS BASED ON A FALSE PREMISE AND WE SHOULDN'T HAVE WENT OVER THERE TO BEGIN WITH. BUSH SHOULD HAVE FINISHED UP THE JOB IN AFGANISTAN. WHICH HE DIDN'T. NOW WE HAVE 2 FAILED WARS.
2007-01-23 09:34:58
·
answer #10
·
answered by Osama W. Bush 1
·
4⤊
1⤋