Iran has announced it's developed a nuclear bomb, which it will launch against Israel unless it leaves Gaza and the West Bank in the next 48 hours). WHAT WOULD YOU DO?
Imagine you are working in the UN..
GUYS U NEED TO IMAGINE YOU WORK IN THE UN. WHAT WOULD YOU DO TO SOLVE SUCH HUGE PROBLEM.
Remember Millons of people relying on you.
We will have second class with diffrent colleges for politics students to discuss it. Any critical answer i will be thankful please.
Hannah
2007-01-23 09:27:24 · 14 answers · asked by Lovly.Angel 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
nothing. Iran wouldnt launch it. it would lead to the destruction of Iran. I wouldnt even believe the claim. but even if it was true i wouldnt expect them to use it. Isreal has broken UN resolutions then any country in the world i didnt believe that when i eas told it but ive checked a few UN sources and it lists them.
2007-01-23 09:33:30 · answer #1 · answered by vibrance0404 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
If Iranian leaders ever completely lost any notion of self preservation and threatened that, and I was UN Secretary General...
The priority obviously would be to prevent nuclear weapons use not only by Iran but also against Iran in a preemptive strike. I'd publicly say that the use of nuclear weapons to target civilian population would be a war crime, that using them against Israel would be an unprovoked, unwarranted and wholly unjustifiable attack that would have the most dire consequences for the region and the world. Then I would say that the first use of nuclear weapons by any state would immediately give cause to any of the other nuclear powers to retaliate in kind. I would try to get unanimous support on the Security Council for a resolution authorizing all necessary military force to disarm Iran of its nuclear weapons, and should it have any, chemical and biological weapons, as well as an international blockade of Iranian sea ports and airspace. No government could ever be allowed to threaten world peace with impunity and the international community would have to be seen to unite and end that threat. The US and European allies would no doubt already be helping Israel prepare to defend itself and the role of the UN while important, would not be the main factor in events.
All of this is presuming Israel didn't immediately launch airstrikes bombing Iran back to the stone age. If it chose to do so after such a threat, the UN would be unable to condemn it.
2007-01-24 21:08:25 · answer #2 · answered by mark 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The president of Iran is an evil man. He would hurt Israel if he could. No one can take down Israel because Israel is protected by Jesus Christ(Yeshua)! By bombing Israel and the West Bank, the muslims would be killing mostly the Palestinians because the West Bank and Gaza ara predominately occupied by the palestinians. yes, I believe that Iran would stoop to using a nuclear bomb in those areas because the Muslims don't mind killing their own Muslim brothers and sisters. If you need proof, just check out how Hezbollah launched an attack against the lebanese people that they supposedly care about or how Hamas attacked the Fatah party. True muslim fellowship? You be the judge.
2007-01-24 08:51:31 · answer #3 · answered by 14 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Not a likely scenario. Consider, Iran has developed a nuclear power plant. Israel has threatened to bomb it in 48 hours... What can be done? Unfortunately nothing, because the "neo-cons" are in Israel's pocket, and Bush is in theirs. So we have more war, and if we are lucky, Bush is right and it does bring Armageddon... but it does NOT!! the Almighty cannot be trifled with, and He will do things the right way in spite of the fools who claim to be acting for Him.
2007-01-25 01:25:34 · answer #4 · answered by hasse_john 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Nothing at all, for the simple reason that it takes more than firework to send a nuclear-bomb, and I'm not aware that Iran has much in the way of suitable missile technology.
They know also, that any attack would result in the total destruction of Iran, and almost immediate invasion afterwards.
2007-01-23 09:48:33 · answer #5 · answered by musonic 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Fly to Westbank and call for international meeting there while declaring it a 'ward of the court' ie under the protection of the international community. This is done with the cooperation of the arab league, and Israel. Call on all nuclear powers to target their missiles on Iran. Move warships into area. Call on Iran to come to conference table to present its case before an International court.
2007-01-23 09:48:15 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
If Iranian leaders ever thoroughly lost any concept of self maintenance and threatened that, and that i became UN Secretary customary... the concern needless to say could be to avert nuclear weapons use no longer by using ability of Iran yet in addition against Iran in a preemptive strike. i could publicly say that using nuclear weapons to objective civilian inhabitants could be a conflict crime, that utilising them against Israel could be an unprovoked, unwarranted and punctiliously unjustifiable attack that would desire to have the main dire outcomes for the area and the international. Then i could say that the 1st use of nuclear weapons by ability of any state could on the instant supply reason to any of the different nuclear powers to retaliate in type. i could attempt to get unanimous help on the protection Council for a decision authorizing all needed militia rigidity to disarm Iran of its nuclear weapons, and could it have any, chemical and organic and organic weapons, besides as a international blockade of Iranian sea ports and airspace. No government might desire to ever be allowed to threaten international peace with impunity and the international community could must be seen to unite and end that hazard. the U. S. and eu allies could little doubt already be helping Israel prepare to guard itself and the function of the UN whilst significant, does no longer be the main significant element in activities. All of it is presuming Israel did no longer on the instant launch airstrikes bombing Iran back to the stone age. If it chosen to realize this after this type of hazard, the UN could be no longer able to sentence it.
2016-11-01 02:46:41 · answer #7 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
well they better be prepare to sent one to the USA first otherwise you can be sure that they will received one too.
to solve this problem before we get to that point we can not allow Iran to finish their nuclear weapon.
he need to be stopped now no later you see what is happening with North Korea.
those people are muslin so if you are no agree on what they think you deserve to be death.
so keep going guy you all are again America but let see when those time come what you going to do.
2007-01-23 13:25:56 · answer #8 · answered by Best Dominican 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
it's far more likely Iran would just drop their nuke with no warning.
the question is, would it reach it's target. (Israel has defenses, it may not make it there, etc.)
i daresay the UN would order Israel to leave, though. not me, i'd order Iran to stand down or face my wrath. (BWAHAHAHAH)
oh and the UN has condemned Israel loads of times. it's the other countries who do the most heinous things that the UN looks the other way on.
2007-01-23 09:45:39 · answer #9 · answered by political junkie 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I reckon this is a valid scenario, only they are more likely to ask the Jews to leave all of Israel. They might just go ahead and nuke Israel anyway, just for the hell of it.
As to what would you do? I reckon there would be nothing you could do.
2007-01-23 09:39:47 · answer #10 · answered by efes_haze 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋