why can't evolutionist accept the many flaws in Darwin's Theory and accept that it is only theory not a fact?

Question

The human being was created as a separate specie by the one who started the act of creation. The Creator is the one who made the heavens, the earth and what is between them including us humans. The one who created time as we know it. The creator existed before time and will exist after time, whatever is created has a finite life including time. We human are just a tiny spec on earth, the earth itself looks like an insignificant spot in the universe. Look at pictures of the earth from space, it can barely be seen behind a thumb. Baboons and Monkeys are still around, we are not related to them. They are a different specie that has been created. Hence referring to them as our cousins is a lot of rubbish. If we humans think we know so much to doubt our own creation, why don't we stop aging? Why can't we stop a person from dying when they are on their death bed? Why does our subconscious refer to a higher being when we have a near death experience? Think about creation....

Answer 1

Fine. I accept it it's only a theory!!! I do no believe in it anymore! I am converted. I will now convert to Christianity, read my Bible, stop thinking for myself, take everything literally, lose all sense of humor and threaten those who don't believe Jesus is the way with eternal damnation.

Happy? Now leave me alone!

Answer 2

Presuming of course that you do actually believe in an Almighty Creator and are too ignorant or too brain washed to accept that evolution is a fact. Darwin's Theory is not merely Darwin's it is THE accepted theory by scientists throughout the world today.

Look around you. Look at all the progress man has made in the last 2,000 years. In answer to your question, yes we can stop aging! On the outside through plastic surgery and by a far less extreme means through the use of medication. In the western world, most of us now do have the luxury of aging. Not so long ago life expectancy was much, much shorter and child mortality rates much much higher. Doctors do save people from dying on a daily basis with heart transplants, blood transfusions and correct diagnosis. As for our subconsiouses refering to a higher level at a near death experience, well I've never had one, have you? Please do not give me stories of what other people have experienced.......other people have also seen UFO's.

What I personally can't understand is why people insist on an Almighty Creator..........I mean really? Adam and Eve, the Garden of Eden. Are you kidding? This is not fact but it is one of the best fables ever written.

Surely if there is an Almighty Creator, then he/she could certainly have masterminded the evolutionary process. I think its quite rude NOT to give the Creator credit for it. There is no need for a belief in a Creator and the belief in evolution to be mutually exclusive.

And one question for you! If God can do everything, can he create a stone so heavy that he can't carry it?

Answer 3

once you think approximately that macroevolution is unscientific. there is not any evidence for it. It has in no way been found in nature or in a lab. Theistic evolution is unbiblical. And, you won't be able to prepare how the Genesis account of shape is a metaphor for evolution. it extremely is via no skill linked metaphorically. It is mindless as a metaphor. There are inconsistencies in theistic evolutuionary thought - for one, the bible is obtrusive that there was once NO dying in the international till sin entered the sector via way of Adam and Eve. If there replaced into as quickly as no death earlier Adam and Eve sinned, then how did macroevolution take region? without death, macroevolution is impossible. additionally, the bible is sparkling that Adam, a guy or woman, replaced into as quickly as created first, by way of this there have been no women individuals yet. God made him sleep, opened his flesh, took out some bone, closed up the flesh, and from it made female. So, we've guy jogging around interior the backyard even earlier than the existence of girls. How can that be a consequences of macroevolution? Adam and Eve could have had mum and dad on your evolutionary scenerio. they does no longer have been completely human parents, otherwise dam and Eve don't have been the universal people. as quickly as greater, how is this achievable?

Answer 4

I can tell you haven't actually studied evolutionary theory or you would not be calling it "Darwin's Theory". Darwin's theory of evolution was flawed, but has been replaced by the Modern Synthesis, which combined genetics and evolution by natural selection. I'm not claiming the modern theory is flawless but all the observations that have been made provide very strong evidence that evolution is broadly true.

Oh and I'm not sure what your point about the earth being insignificant is about. I agree that it is, but surely that observation is more compatible with a "random and meaningless universe" than one that was created specifically for humans.

Answer 5

In common usage, people often use the word theory to signify a conjecture, an opinion, or a speculation. In this usage, a theory is not necessarily based on facts; in other words, it is not required to be consistent with true descriptions of reality. True descriptions of reality are more reflectively understood as statements that would be true independently of what people think about them.

In science a fact is an objective and verifiable observation, in contrast with a theory, which is an explanation of or interpretation of facts. Some scholars in the philosophy of science question whether scientific facts are truly objective or are always "theory-laden" to some degree. Thomas Kuhn and others as well pointed out that knowing what facts to measure, and how to measure them, requires some presupposition about the facts themselves.[citation needed] In the field of science studies, "scientific facts" are generally seen as entities which exist within complex social structures of trust, accreditation, institutions, and individual practices.

Answer 6

i dont understand how someone could doubt evolution based on lack of proof and then preech creationism wich has absolutly no proof or evidence of its happening. darwins theory has flaws but the christian theory of creationism has absolutly no factual basis to speek of. if you are going to doubt the most probable solution to a problem be prepared to give an alternative solution to the problem based on actual evidence proving your point. the bible may tell you it has all of the answers but if you actually understand it, it is telling you that you know nothing. making inferences based on a text that tells you that you know nothing is going against how the bible tells you to live your life.

Answer 7

man...you guys just don't give up do you.

I guess using the proved logic of evolution. The christianity philosophy will become the survivor, because its the one where the most crazy people persist in converting everybody or being perpetually annoyed for eternity in hell on how we need to read the bible..

So ok, you win, you are evolutionally superior...I put down my wig on your knee, I sit on it, and I read my bible.....just please, I beg you....HAVE MERCY!! please, don't annoy me!! I can't take it any longer....AAAAAAAHHHHHH!...I beleive in your hell now! ok? I have seen IT and heard it! just calm your monkey *** down.


I hope you beleive in evolution now that you are the superior philosophy that survived the confrontation. See? truth always wins...righteousness...out of error prone philosophies...is 'naturally selected' by GOD!! see!!? evolution exists..

Now please go away before I start screaming like a little girl in the closet before you come back.

Answer 8

They like to make a mountain out of a mole hill.

Answer 9

becouse they are upset by the fact we were created by god with the intention to rule over all creatures. they think they know everything about everything when realy untill you know god you know nothing and your just making loose connections bettween a apple and a melon. basical evolutionists are melons!