they only lost by 3 to the bears and n.o. got routed by 25 points.
shouldn't holmgrem coach the probowl instead of payton?
2007-01-23 08:50:51 · 7 answers · asked by Chetos NFL Bowl Series Comisionr 2 in Sports ➔ Football (American)
They were the #4 seeded team and they didn't make the conference championship game. It doesn't matter who's #2, they're still at home watching the game.
2007-01-23 09:28:33 · answer #1 · answered by Willdawg3 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No!
What did Holmgren do to merit coaching the ProBowl? He has had a team that is consistently ranked in the top few teams in the beginning of the season, and every year he gets the same results, nothing.
Meanwhile, Payton took a team that was 3-13, the worst team in football, and took them to the Conference Championship the next year.
There is no comparison between the 2.
2007-01-23 08:56:52 · answer #2 · answered by answerman 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
No. Some teams just match up against Chicago better than other teams. Arizona also played them closer than New Orleans and they suck.
A loss is a loss. They didn't make it to the conference championships.
2007-01-23 08:59:57 · answer #3 · answered by Jukeboxster 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Yes.
1. Saints
2. Seahawks
3. Bears
2007-01-23 09:00:53 · answer #4 · answered by edempsey18 4 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Kind of a moot question I would think. Record wise, the Seahawks probably had a better year, but I would not begrudge the Saints their victory lap. What they did was quite a feat.
-Dio
2007-01-23 09:00:06 · answer #5 · answered by diogenese19348 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Yes, because the seahawks were the defending nfc champs. the saints were the darkhorse. & a good team at that!
2007-01-23 11:22:35 · answer #6 · answered by BIGUS_RICKUS 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no the bears are the #2 team in the AFC the saints were the best team
2007-01-23 08:56:59 · answer #7 · answered by Montreal Canadiens Fan 1011 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋