In both cases a woman is making a choice not to have a child that is not yet born. Maybe if we just took away a woman's right to choose (and to drive) the world would be a better place. Any thoughts?
2007-01-23 08:35:11 · 7 answers · asked by Sir Alex Awesome Valentine, Esq. 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
Abstinence is like premeditated murder (as it is planned) in this example. Why don't we get every woman who is capable of doing so pregnant?
2007-01-23 08:47:31 · update #1
Well if a women chooses not to get pregnant then the baby would never existed. If you get an abortion then you are pretty much killing the baby. Unborn or not it is still a living thing.
You can keep trying to find ways to justify killing babies but you are not going to find one.
2007-01-23 08:40:49 · answer #1 · answered by Luekas 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I have a better idea, instead of circumsizing babies when they are born, lets just go ahead and cut the whole thing off. The world would diffenetly be a better place.
Would not be making a choice not to have a child, just making a choice not to have YOURS
2007-01-24 12:49:55 · answer #2 · answered by Mom 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Chris Rock, in his stand-up routine, advises men to pick up women at pro-choice rallies. He asys they are more willing to engage in responsibility-free sex!
2007-01-23 08:40:44 · answer #3 · answered by American citizen and taxpayer 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Choosing not to get pregnant is one thing..... Murdering an unborn child is another.
2007-01-23 08:41:35 · answer #4 · answered by Smitty 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Are you equating abstinence with murder?
2007-01-23 08:44:06 · answer #5 · answered by me 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
lol, I can see where your coming from. However, its better jsut to say that the fatehr has a say in abortion as well as the mother.
2007-01-23 08:38:59 · answer #6 · answered by v_mordecai_v 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
if she doesnt want it then she doesnt need to have it. its not ur choice. whats wrong with abortion?
2007-01-23 08:41:01 · answer #7 · answered by le 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋