If everything aesthetically was the same ......and the hydro -- electric was better for our environment would you trade?
Why....why not?
If you are unwilling to trade aren't you and your convenience part of the problem?
2007-01-23 08:30:51 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Mr BOHO:
The 16th amendment relates to Article 1 Section 9 on the constitution.
It makes the income tax a law. However, Article 1 Section 9 says that any such law is in fact unconstitutional!
Read It!!!
Also unlike you ....I don't give a damn WHO enacted Eminent Domain.....I just want it repealed it's wrong!
If some small land developer decides they like the property YOU reside at .....they can LEGALLY take your property and develop it!!! I guess you can't see past your own face!
2007-01-24 00:53:12 · update #1
all things being equal, then hell yes. we should have done this 20 years ago. if we had, we wouldn't be in Iraq right now.
2007-01-23 08:36:59 · answer #1 · answered by truth seeker 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Probably not - you probably wouldn't get the same amount of engine power/torque. I personally have a Landrover Discovery 3 diesel 2.7Litre - couldn't live with out it. And before you say "I bet you only use it for the school run" - I have a business that depends on it (mechanic).
The new Land Rover Freelander 2 combines both technologies to create a hybrid - when the vehicle brakes, the power generated from the braking gets stored into batteries to power the vehichle at lower speeds such as 20MPH or less. This is a good idea because you reserve the power that you can obtain by the fuel to create the bigger speeds and the most torque. If Land Rover offered a hybrid version of the LR3, I may be interested.
2007-01-23 08:34:54 · answer #2 · answered by jobo 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
the main important reason is as a results of variation of how they force. A SUV or "interest utility automobile" is a 4-Wheel force, this skill that all of the wheels are shifting the automobile forward. With sedans and different small vehicles, many situations they're basically 2 wheel force, this skill that in the course of basic terms 2 wheels are pushing the automobile and the different 2 are rolling alongside. yet another reason they're costly is as a results of fact they're bigger, and fee extra money to make as a results of fact extra issues are mandatory. finally, many SUV's have the present day technologies from that vehicle maker. Many have leather-based seats, cameras, GPS, and all the different bells and whistles you may get. in case you opt for to get an SUV and additionally you will pay for it, do not choose for the GMC or Chevrolet, choose for the Audi, Lexus, and Mercedes-Benz SUV's. I unquestionably have an Audi Q7, and that i like it!
2016-12-16 15:43:00 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
So- for this Hydro-electric vehicle to run, would I need to park it every night at the base of Hoover Dam? What the heck is a hydro SUV?
What kind of a question is this? Of course we'd like to stop sending money to enemies of our nation in the middle east and contributing to global warming.
2007-01-23 08:46:09 · answer #4 · answered by Morey000 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No because I like to travel and nothing will ever beat the reliability and Independence of internal combustion engine.It will take about 6 hours to recharge compared to filling the tank in 5 minutes plus you cannot recharge in the wild.
2007-01-23 08:45:24 · answer #5 · answered by Dr.O 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
you know I wish I could afford a hybrid as is but I see people out there like Jay Leno for example he has this huge beast of a machine that he just recently boasted how he increased the cars fuel economy by 100 percent, he now gets 6 miles to the gallon in his roadster, yay for him, anyways I just don't think that the people that could afford something like that really care about anything but massive amounts of horsepower, which they just aren't going to get with a hybrid vehicle, if they could get the same amount of horsepower maybe some of them would change, but I doubt it
2007-01-23 08:38:20 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
this idiot kelly B thinks the liberal supreme courts didnt just expand eminent domain. what a doofus.
she also said in an answer that the sixthteenth amendment is unconstituional. LOL do u see the logic in that??!!!
libtards like her are so dumb.
and thats a memo
2007-01-23 17:04:19 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Absolutely. As long as I can get from point A to point B in a timely fasion I am ok with it.
2007-01-23 08:39:49 · answer #8 · answered by Open Minded Human 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hell yeah I'd switch. You seen the price of gas lately?
2007-01-23 08:37:49 · answer #9 · answered by texasjewboy12 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
why is it better? you gonna sink that battery in the atlantic when you are done with it?
2007-01-23 09:01:50 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋