2007-01-23 08:18:38 · 19 answers · asked by Nestea 2 in Sports ➔ Football (American)
Favre because of his arm strength and accuracy. Cunningham had the scrambling ability but lacked in accuracy.
2007-01-23 08:23:04 · answer #1 · answered by edempsey18 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I can't believe anyone would actually say Randall Cunningham is better than Favre.
Favre will go down in history with names like Unitas, Montana and Elway, and he'll be enshrined in Canton soon enough. Cunningham was a good QB, but he's a big notch below any of the names I mentioned. A good scrambler, but it took him years to develop into any sort of pocket passer. And while he was good with the deep ball, he never developed the accuracy for the short and midrange throws.
Favre is likely in the top 10 QBs of all-time. Cunningham would be lucky to break the top 50.
2007-01-23 16:30:22 · answer #2 · answered by Craig S 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Favre could pass Marino is two major all-time qb stats if he is a starter somewhere next year. N'uff said.
2007-01-23 16:23:53 · answer #3 · answered by Son of Krypton 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
favre hands down. better numbers at everything. and yes RIP Reggie but he retired as a what? thought so
2007-01-23 20:15:55 · answer #4 · answered by Chester 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Randall
2007-01-23 16:21:18 · answer #5 · answered by Jay 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋
i want favre he is still the best i dont like cunningham.
2007-01-23 16:23:09 · answer #6 · answered by lcayote 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Cunningham. End of Question!
2007-01-23 17:19:56 · answer #7 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
favre definitely
2007-01-23 18:07:18 · answer #8 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
favre
2007-01-23 16:31:40 · answer #9 · answered by bhs00 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Farve
2007-01-23 16:22:02 · answer #10 · answered by hamthugger 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋