Ok so in the beginning of the movie it shows Rose when shes like 100 living with her grand daughter. According to this website it was actors? I thought it was the real Rose... why didnt they use the real one?
http://movies.yahoo.com/movie/1800026398/cast
2007-01-23 08:11:16 · 11 answers · asked by babygirlxo 2 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Movies
Then what about the blue diamond necklace?
2007-01-23 08:19:34 · update #1
The story of Titanic was true....not the story of Jack and Rose or the necklace. It's called a plot...to make the movie more interesting and heartbreaking.
2007-01-23 08:25:29 · answer #1 · answered by Renee 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They didn't use the real Rose because Jack and Rose are fictionial characters created by James Cameron.
Here is the answer about the diamond:
What ever became of the Coeur de la Mer (the Heart of the Ocean) diamond?
The diamond was a fictional creation used to give Brock Lovett and the other treasure hunters a reason to hear Rose's story.
On March 22, 1998 a real version, created by Asprey London was auctioned off for $2.2 million to an unidentified buyer at a charity ball for Diana, Princess of Wales Memorial Fund and Southern California's Aid for AIDS. It has a 170-carat sapphire set in platinum, with 65 30-carat diamonds. The new necklace was loaned to Celine Dion, who wore it during her performance of the movie's theme song at the Academy Awards in 1998.
2007-01-23 16:16:49 · answer #2 · answered by Riss 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because there is no real Rose she is fake. Most of the movies is fake.... the lead characters rose and whats his face FAKE not real there was no love story like that on the Titanic....
2007-01-23 16:17:41 · answer #3 · answered by ophelialarue 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I have always thought that she was the "real" rose too. And her kids as well. But because its a movie, they always want to protect the true story characters. Maybe she didn't want to go on the big screen? I still beleive it was her.
2007-01-23 16:17:08 · answer #4 · answered by monkeysgirl04 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Rose was a fictional character. She never existed in real life.
2007-01-23 16:20:57 · answer #5 · answered by referencelibrarian55 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
To make it more realistic. Kate Winslet in aging makeup would have looked ridiculous. Plus, the lady who played the older Rose was an award winning actress.
2007-01-23 16:15:05 · answer #6 · answered by t_rav 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Rose is not a real person.... it was made up for the movie
2007-01-23 16:15:11 · answer #7 · answered by blue121 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Because ROSE DOESNT EXIST IN REAL LIFE
2007-01-23 16:15:07 · answer #8 · answered by fall 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Umm, because it was only a movie? Hate to sink your battleship there.
2007-01-23 16:14:43 · answer #9 · answered by desertskieswoman 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
She wanted too much money.
She only speaks in Ebonics.
She parties way too much...
...(bad drug problem, very sad).
2007-01-23 16:20:54 · answer #10 · answered by Chris C 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋