I understand Chavez is a threat to our country, promoting the teachings of Jesus Christ around the world. This could become contagious. We have to do something. I recommend we get some laws on the books that specify harsh penalties and punishments for anyone that shows charity to others or considers the plight of the public rather than the elite. This has got to stop. Who's next -- ECUADOR?
2007-01-23 08:10:11 · 7 answers · asked by Murphy 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Feeding the hungry. Clothing the naked. Educating the ignorant. Healing the sick. This sounds like the Beatitudes to me, as preached in the Sermon on the Mount, Matthew 5. Don't be fooled, this is a very dangerous strain of Christianity this maniac Chavez is spreading, and it is most definitely a threat to our way of life. There is nothing funny about it, buster!!
2007-01-23 08:22:34 · update #1
I don't think any religion should be outlawed, but if we outlawed assholes, that would take care of most of 'em!
2007-01-23 08:33:50 · answer #1 · answered by texasjewboy12 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
hey murph you are funny I like that spirit. I choose to agree and disagree. Agree with the joke and disagree for criminal punishment for religion, especially Christianity? Why I think they were right in invading everywhere and killing people with that cross pasted on their chests, only kidding ha ha. And Ecuador, oh yeah for sure, protect those women they need to keep up their barbarian ways like chopping off penises? Look up Lorena Bobbitt case in study? Ironically enough Venezuela is as Christian as the Mormons in Utah, ha ha. I have been there and could not wait to leave. Thank god we had a boat and that Aruba is only 16 miles away, and narrowly escaped those barbaric Mongrels, with machine guns? Oh yes they were military and the police. Real civilization, next thing you know they will be promoting tourism?
2007-01-23 08:21:43 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
the detest crimes bill has no longer something despite to do with any of the incidences stated there. All it does is supply greater durable sentences for issues that are ALREADY crimes, if the reason being shown to be prompted by ability of hate. From a bite of writing by ability of the sponsors of the bill: "Claims that the bill will enable prosecutions of "hate speech" additionally are deceptive. The act punishes violence that ends up in death or actual harm, no longer speech. no longer something interior the bill will trump every person's top to loose speech." Janet Folger is the two fallacious or deceptive.
2016-11-01 02:38:23 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No you're a bit confused. It isn't Christ that Hugo is preaching, it's Karl Marx. Rather the opposite of Christ, really. Hmm, maybe anit-Christ?
EDIT-and yeah, if it was sarcasm, I bought it lol. Score one against gonzo!
2007-01-23 08:14:28 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Spoken like a true liberal !! Did you get that out of the ACLU news letter...
2007-01-23 08:24:12 · answer #5 · answered by bereal1 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Be careful, some wingnut might not catch the sarcasm.
2007-01-23 08:14:01 · answer #6 · answered by bettysdad 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
drink arizona diet green tea with ginseng, it will make it all better.
2007-01-23 08:17:55 · answer #7 · answered by echc 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋