I see this bogus question a lot.
I've yet to see very many instances of this, so using the words of a small number of people to paint everyone else is intellectually dishonest.
Who was trying to destroy Clinton? He'd committed crimes. We believe in holding people answerable for actual crimes. But you'd have to be grounded in reality to understand that statement.
2007-01-23 07:42:32
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
You are free to hate President Bush and his policies, the Constitution of the US gives you that right. The problem is that during times of war, we should all pull together and present a united front against our enemies.
When you are openly bad mouthing our President you are empowering our enemies and endangering the lives of our troops. You are dividing our country by insulting and degrading our leader. Yes, you have that right just as we have the right to defend him. What you are really doing though is putting your selfish opinions ahead of the safety of our troops and this country. This equates to hating America as you are providing a service to our enemies.
As for Clinton - as much as I hated the man and his policies (and still do), I never spoke negatively of him while in office. It's called respect for his position. Many in this country no longer know the meaning of the word.
2007-01-23 07:50:35
·
answer #2
·
answered by LadySable 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
It's sad when people do this crap. Bin Laden would have been killed if the republicans would have left ole Billy alone when he was trying to bomb him in the first place.
But your question sounds pretty hateful. Maybe it's not America that you hate, just Bush or just republicans, or just freedom of speech for those who disagree with you. Pretty funny really. I mean let's face it, when americans hate othe americans more than radical islam, well... Divided we fall...
2007-01-24 11:37:39
·
answer #3
·
answered by deangowarrior 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
Foreigners do no longer understand what freedom repugs keep speaking about. various the international has an same freedoms as u.s.. that's in user-friendly words those with issues that are stated contained in the media. The media does no longer communicate about the aspects of the international that's extra sophisticated than cowboy u.s..
2016-12-02 23:04:27
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
why do people who dont like bush hate him and hate the world in general so much. why so much hate? were you abused as a kid?
For the record I dont agree with all Bush administration policies and Clinton, he didnt need anyone to destroy him he did that all by himself.
2007-01-23 07:38:30
·
answer #5
·
answered by sociald 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
That stereotype evolved out of a movement to of the Repubics to gain support for the war... that is actually very common in an effort to motivate ppl to support ppl dieing.
2007-01-23 09:38:36
·
answer #6
·
answered by BeachBum 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
The individuals you refer to are using a logical fallicy called "ad homonim" in their arguments. This technique is used to invalidate the opposition's argument by questioning the credibility of their opponent.
Example: He voted for Bush. He is a necromancer. People who vote for Bush are necromancers. This argument is not logical.
2007-01-23 07:43:55
·
answer #7
·
answered by voodooprankster 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
Delusions of grandeur.
Like with what Republicans say when they accuse of being the "Blame America First" Crowd.
I don't blame America first, I blame Republicans first.
They aren't America.
2007-01-23 07:37:23
·
answer #8
·
answered by ck4829 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
Because you Bush rs don't seem to care whether America is attacked or not. You are more interested in gaining your power back than you are at preventing another attack by ist. You seem to want everyone to forget 9/11 and that the country is threatened by the biggest threat we have ever faced.
2007-01-23 07:36:42
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
Clinton destroyed himself. I had nothing to with that!
2007-01-23 07:36:06
·
answer #10
·
answered by smile 2
·
1⤊
3⤋