I am a feminist, but never radical.. as mentioned before, anything radical is bad. Radicals have lost sight of the true aims, which are to gain equality - or the case i argue for is self-reliance. Housewives are seen as being dependant on their men, regarding bringing in money and social security, etc. Many women opt for careers now, or at least try to incorporate work into their lives to break out of this system. you never know what could happen these days, its just sensible to be prepared to make your own way through life -i.e. when your hubby leaves you for a younger model, etc.
Radicals just blame men for everything, overlooking that fact that things are getting better now.
Don't forget, a lot of men argue for the right to stay at home at look after their kids now - it's no myth.
2007-01-24 07:29:39
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Sometimes. It my feelings about it vary based on how many men have whistled at me, called me "honey", or referred to me as a girl even though I am an adult woman that day.
It's interesting that the majority of people are not phased by radical sexism (the many people on here who insist that women should not even have jobs or do anything that takes them away from their housekeeping duties), yet nearly everyone is appalled by "radical feminist" women who just want equality in every sector of their lives.
2007-01-24 13:10:55
·
answer #2
·
answered by Julia 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I believe it worked about 150 years ago. Today, however, I don't think it's really necessary in most situations. Hunger strikes, for example . . .that's pretty radical. Women needed some pretty radical changes back when feminism first started.
2007-01-23 07:25:35
·
answer #3
·
answered by Who Knew! 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
no. I don't agree with many radical feminist views and I'm a woman. But as has already been mentioned .. nothing radical is good. I think some women take it too far and start blaming men for everything.
2007-01-23 07:26:46
·
answer #4
·
answered by bb 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
No not radical feminism but I am a feminist - so Im told! You have to ask yourself why there was ever a need for such a term.
2007-01-23 07:26:24
·
answer #5
·
answered by sarahlou 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
Not at all. Females whether radical or not are females and feminisn is a falacy. Since time immemorial feminism has been left for women who question why they were created differently from men.. Its kiling the purpose of Gods creation of a woman.
2007-01-23 19:11:52
·
answer #6
·
answered by poorkidone 2
·
0⤊
3⤋
Anything radical is bad
2007-01-23 07:24:28
·
answer #7
·
answered by Black Like A Tar 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
i might want to say that earlier to the liberation stream woman were held in a larger regard. a million. adult males used to face at the same time as a lady walked right into a room. 2. adult males used to face at the same time as a lady were given up from the table. 3. adult males used the time period ma'am at the same time as chatting with a lady. 4. adult males might want to open doors for females. 5. adult males might want to carry out an umbrella throughout foul climate. 6. adult males might want to carry out an arm or lay down a handkerchief to help a lady over a dirt puddle. 7. adult males might want to tip their hat to the ladies. 8. Rape turned right into a lot less of a probability. 9. Harming a "defenseless" woman become challenge to harsh criminal codes. 10. adult males respected woman thoroughly, words like mom Earth, mom of Invention, The Bosom of mom, and so on were heartfelt sayings.
2016-12-02 23:03:35
·
answer #8
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
YES !!! It attracts ugly women. Angry feminists have no children because they 1. are too busy to get pregnant 2. and if they ger pregnant they abort. So it contributes to have less ugly peopel around. Make society more beautifull through feminism.
2007-01-23 15:08:40
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Yes, I do. Not all aspects of it, to be sure, but I do for the most part.
2007-01-23 15:28:50
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋