who would support pulling out of Iraq causing a larger war in Middle East and more 9/11's?

Answer 1

Not me.
You'll find plenty of liberals who will though.
Lets just all ban together with positive support of those that are risking their lives for our freedom and the way of life we've come to know and love.
Lets "Git r done" before we pull out.

Answer 2

Do you mean to ask "Who would support pulling out of Iraq if there was good reason to believe that it would cause a larger war in Middle East and more 9/11's?"?

And of course, if you wanted serious answers instead of pundit responses, you'd need to provide links or facts that demonstrated that those scenarios were plausible.

I'm all for the facts, just provide some.

Answer 3

Do any of you actually even know any liberals? If they are the ones pushing Bush hate and Bush blame then you need to begin worrying because that is nearly 70 percent of the population of the United States.

I support a responsible withdrawal of troops from Iraq, not sending more troops over there (and the majority of the country feels the same).

If that results in a larger war in the Middle East and more 9/11s then it will not be because we stayed way past our welcome in Iraq.

GBY

Answer 4

I think your assertions are dubious. How about asking, Who would support staying in Iraq causing a larger war in the Middle East and more 9/11's?.

It is equally if not more probable since violence is spreading in the Middle East while we stay and all agencies within our Federal Government report that our involvement in Iraq is creating more terrorists.

Answer 5

Bush used the tragedy of 911 to scare the yank public into believing that the U.S. now had to combat a conflict against terror. as quickly as this leap grow to be made and standard, the be conscious terror or terrorist could want for use to describe everyone that the U.S. needed to attack. because it seems Iraq grow to be the call that George Bush and Dick Cheney made. whether unfaithful, they mentioned that Saddam had get entry to to weapons of mass destruction, so they used a U.N. treaty to justify the attack. This outlines the worst distant places coverage determination the U.S. has made on account that Vietnam. Many think of that the Bush administration knew that the WMD's did no longer exist, yet this grow for use besides to start the conflict.

Answer 6

Why not leave and arm them all to the teeth? let their own internal strife and hate for each other thin their population. Peace in the middle east only means a growing unchecked population. do you really want more of them?

Answer 7

And how exactly was Iraq involved in 9/11? Oh yes, that's right, they weren't. In any way. At all. NOBODY except ignorant fools claim they were - because there simply is absolutely no evidence for it.

Pulling out of Iraq probably won't help the situation much, but at least it will stop our soldiers getting killed for no reason whatsoever.

Answer 8

i think that we should pull out of Iraq because we are having Americans dying. It's not the US' business to be in Iraq.
We need control or pull out!!!

Answer 9

Hypothetical and conniving question do not get a simple yes or no answer.

If every evidence and every consequence are obvious and proofed correct, the path of minimal damage will be chosen.

Answer 10

How will it end by our presence?

The people of that area of the world have been involved in secular war since the beginning of that religion!