Good point. Have you seen the deformities that Iraqi babies are being born with due to the use of those uranium tipped missiles.
2007-01-23 07:00:56
·
answer #1
·
answered by Retired From Y!A 5
·
2⤊
1⤋
The War in Iraq was a good move at first, however Bush did make SOME mistakes. He should have deployed more troops a long time ago; this would have helped end the war sooner. We still have to keep it going though because we risk ourselves and the people of Iraq if we just pick up and leave. We are still there because we have to help the country run itself, otherwise the terrorists will take control and have a very high level of power. This is our biggest reason for still being there that people don't seem to know or understand. Once the government of Iraq finds a sense of stability, we can pull out. We can't give terrorists a chance at total control of a country. It'd be immoral and stupid.
2016-05-24 01:27:41
·
answer #2
·
answered by Sandra 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Are you sure that you have your facts right. Hundreds of thousands killed by Americans in Iraq ??? Where did you get those figures. Bush is talking about starting a war in Iran ?? Are you sure ? He has mentioned Iran a number of times, but I never heard any plans for going to war.
Uranium tipped missiles ? There has been no report of any uranium poisoning that I know of.
Napalm was used in Vietnam, not Iraq. And not by any order from Bush.
Dominate the world in what way ? America has given Cuba and the Philippines their freedom. We sure don't want any more land from anyone. Get your facts straight.
You did not post a question, instead you're trying to spread Muslim propaganda. Sorry, idiots will believe you, intelligent people can see what you're doing.
2007-01-23 07:34:16
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
You are not serious, "not to mention the KNOWN secret torture camps" the known secret huh. Stop reading conspiracy theory websites, your mind is too weak to comprehend them.
So your evidence that Bush is Hitler is that we are a fighting a war and people are dying? So Roosevelt is Hitler because he committed genocide against the Nazi's, Kennedy is Hitler because he committed genocide on the Vietnamese, Clinton is Hitler because he committed genocide against the Bosnians and Somalis. Who else is Hitler, George Washington those redcoats certainly think so, Lincoln ask a redneck. Hitler's intent was to exterminate all non-Aryans from this planet. Bush has never expressed or acted as if that was his goal, no matter what your whacko conspiracy friends think. The Wahabbi sect of Islam however believes convert or die. Who's Hitler?
2007-01-23 07:12:42
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
But Hitler, set out to mke the mater race, ie: blond hair blue eye prodostant german.
Hitler was just plain EVIL.
Bush is just plain RETARDED
thta is a huge differance.
As evil as hitler was, he was a genius, he was psycotic, yes, but a genius none the less.
Bush isn't anywhere NEAR hitlers comprehention level.
It is the same point, POWER, both bush and Hitler crave power, and that is the root to all evil, but it would be like comparing satan's minions to satan.
Bush is too stupid to be like hitler.
But I agree we need to pull out, what ever happened to finding Bin Laden. Isn't that what this war is suposed to be about.
I didn't know Iraq and afghanistan were the same country, But I guess Bush knew that *sarcasm*
hey, ! - you are such a pupet for the government. you are so gullible. It's like in WW2 when all of america believed the government when the said, "no Hitler ISN"T killing millions, everything is fine"
Yeah and how many people died that America tried to turn the other cheek.
There have been hundreds of thousands of people dying. in the middle east war since 1991.
You get YOUR facts straight. The iraq people don't want us there, they wanted help getting Sadam, we did, now we need to get out.
2007-01-23 07:03:00
·
answer #5
·
answered by danksprite420 6
·
2⤊
2⤋
If you have proof that he is.. why not present it? But, to answer your unrelated points..
Napalm was not used.
DU rounds are used against armor, and have been proven to have little or no impact on the surrounding area.
The "pain on the backs of the people of Islam" is being caused by other Muslims. The closest thing to genocide.. is being done by Muslims.
Further, there is nothing sinister about the PNAC statement.. unless you believe that democracy and economic freedom are evil. Do you?
2007-01-23 07:03:31
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
Aren't the ist who set off the the ones responsible for civilians????
Would you rather be treated like the detainees at Club Gitmo, or would you rather be treated like Nick Berg.
I would rather have the war on ism be held in the middle east rather than here in the United States. If moderate muslims will not truly fight the radical, militant savages that are in their own culture, they will suffer the casualties of the militants.
2007-01-23 07:01:55
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
uranium tipped missiles is a belief with no proof of.
Bush does not equate to hitler in the one way that made hitler, hitler. Bush is fighting PC instead of bombing the hell out of these people, making them wish they fight another war. Look at europe, that is basically what has happened to them. They witnessed the horrors of utter destruction, maybe that is all the Middle east needs.
2007-01-23 06:58:38
·
answer #8
·
answered by Longhaired Freaky Person 1
·
2⤊
3⤋
You are correct......There is great misery in this world because of this misguided administeration...The only religious body to my knowledge that has a criteria for a just war is the Roman Catholic Church..The war in Iraq violated these criteria from the very start..Why in the hell the religious leaders of the world do not come out against this murderous action is beyond me.
2007-01-23 07:03:09
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
You have no clue what you are talking about. War is war, people die. That is unfortunate, but it is not genocide. Genocide is Hitler killing millions of innocent people. Genocide is Saddam gassing thousands upon thousands of Kurds for the crime of being Kurds.
P.S. Napalm has not been used since the early 1970s. Get the facts before you rant.
2007-01-23 06:59:53
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
4⤋