Simple, they do not know how to tell the truth. Shiraaz, if they found them, where are they??
2007-01-23 06:43:58
·
answer #1
·
answered by Frank R 7
·
4⤊
7⤋
Where did you get your facts from. I am not of any party but I have enough sense to see the reality of WMD's. There was somewhere in the neighborhood of 25 intelligence agencies that claimed that Saddam had WMD's. There have been people who worked for Saddam up until the US attacks that say the intelligence was correct. There has been mustard gas (a WMD) found since the invasion of Iraq in Iraq. The UN also claimed that Saddam had WMD's. I have a hard time believing that all these reports are wrong. Where there is smoke there is fire. Saddam was given warning that we were coming while GB tried to rally support and he had the WMD's moved and hidden. The world will see these weapons at some time.
2007-01-23 06:49:15
·
answer #2
·
answered by joevette 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
What difference does it make? Do you beleive it was wrong to remove Saddam? That he posed absolutely no threat to anyone? Maybe he was simply misunderstood? Maybe we as a country are just a bunch of bullies picking on little innocent Saddam. In fact the next time someone blows up a building or slaughters innocents we should send them a thank you letter.
2007-01-23 06:55:57
·
answer #3
·
answered by yeraluzer 4
·
3⤊
0⤋
Iraq DID have them
Iraq did use them under Saddam
Some were found as well as some critical parts needed to make them
Huge suspicion that since the borders were not secure, that WoMD probably made it into Iran and Syria
Grow up, uber-lib... and live in the real world
2007-01-23 06:48:45
·
answer #4
·
answered by DiamondDave 5
·
2⤊
1⤋
Then why did we find over 500 warheads ready to be used? Oh and the defected iraqi pilots that said they were in charge of moving them around the country. Oh and The recordings we had before the war that they played for the whole country to hear about iraqi officers talking on the phone about moving the chemical weapons to other locations. The problem is they hid the weapons and we couldn't come up with them so the democrats had a field day with it. We cant find missing property or missing people in our own country! You think we could find them in another country while being shot at. Your blind to the truth.
2007-01-23 06:45:22
·
answer #5
·
answered by joe 2
·
4⤊
2⤋
Have you ever saw film of the five thousand men, women, and children who were gased by Hussein because they were Curds
Hussein had plenty of time to remove WMD to Syria before we moved in..
2007-01-23 06:46:49
·
answer #6
·
answered by rallman@sbcglobal.net 5
·
3⤊
1⤋
Nope.. Iraq never had them. The Kurds & Iranians were just playing an April fools joke on the world.
2007-01-23 06:42:18
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
Lol Nico... your dead on target!
but 5 to 1 says the writer of this question will completely ignore what you put down.
I mean why deal with facts when you have biased angry rhetoric on your side?
2007-01-23 06:48:41
·
answer #8
·
answered by Stone K 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
WMDs were in fact found. And no, I don't care if they were old. Let me try them on your family if you think they are not still effective.
• Found: 1.77 metric tons of enriched uranium
• Found: 1,500 gallons of chemical weapons
• Found: 1,000 radioactive materials--ideal for radioactive dirty bombs
• Found: 17 chemical warheads--some containing cyclosarin, a nerve agent five times more powerful than sarin
• Found: Roadside bomb loaded with sarin gas
2007-01-23 06:52:09
·
answer #9
·
answered by DannyK 6
·
2⤊
2⤋
Got a thing about WMD's, pal?
2007-01-23 06:47:45
·
answer #10
·
answered by 34th B.G. - USAAF 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
oh come on dude! You should know by now how the game is played. Politicians (Democrat and Republican) lie to make themselves look good or to shift blame.
2007-01-23 06:44:19
·
answer #11
·
answered by Jerry H 5
·
1⤊
2⤋