What do they think will happen in a few years if we allow hezbollah (you may also insert iran or even syria) to finance a new government in Iraq?
Are they incapable of understanding that they would soon be financed virtually limitless if we allowed them to run iraq?
2007-01-23 06:36:18 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
--
why do libs ignore the points i make here, and twist it into a pathetic chance to preach anti-bush rhetoric?
2007-01-23 06:45:37 · update #1
its funny they make the excuse that bush lied about wmd. but the truth is that either they did have them or IRAQ lied about wmd. their own military munitions coordinators all said I dont have them but the guy next to me does. and on down the line. this is why there were mobile weapons stations moving around the border of Iran. It was to make Iran think they had them to keep them out of Iraq. If we didn't take Saddam out sooner or later Iran would have. then with their stronger military and support from Russia and china it would have been much more of a blood bath to get them out of Iraq and Iran. The history books will be favorable on the decisions.
so to answer your question yes they are incapable of seeing that it would be disastrous or they would have been aboard the entire time.
2007-01-23 06:47:56 · answer #1 · answered by CaptainObvious 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
incapable? I think we see the repercussions of Bush's action in Iraq very well.. and we want no more of his actions!
your 'points' are based on your belief that Bush will somehow make it better.. since we don't share that common ground, there is no base to start a conversation.. in other words we can't discuss Hezbollah or Iran or Syria in Iraq until the idea of Bush being good or bad for the situation has been agreed upon.. we realize this.. why don't you?
2007-01-23 06:42:58 · answer #2 · answered by pip 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Then Dubya should have left Saddam in power.....
How do we know that a new, "democratic" Iraq will not vote to "throw in" with Iran? What if "the people" choose it???
2007-01-23 06:42:38 · answer #3 · answered by Joey's Back 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Fabulous question.
It's unthinkable, and why we need more troops over there.
They think blaming Bush fixes something.
2007-01-23 06:54:46 · answer #4 · answered by ? 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Why did Bush allow it to happen then?
added:
Who said impeachment here on these answers?
2007-01-23 06:38:58 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋