English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

6 answers

Of course he was right. Top bloke, Charlie Marx.

Apart from getting the maid pregnant and blaming it on Freddie Engels.

And sitting on his fat a*se in the British Library all day instead of getting a proper job.

But he was definitely right about this one!

2007-01-23 07:48:10 · answer #1 · answered by mcfifi 6 · 0 0

This citation is oftentimes taken as a huge distinction between theoretical philosophy and useful/political philosophy. The actuality seeker Marx has in techniques here is G.W.F. Hegel, the idealist actuality seeker who (arguably) sees guy as swept away via historic past, without authentic administration over what happens. a guy or woman is, as Hegel could placed it, area of the "spirit of the age." in this type, historic past determines the guy. Marx famously places Hegel "on his head" via arguing that guy has the potential to verify historic past via his movements. in this type, Marx thinks that it extremely is attainable for philosophy to alter the international no count if it extremely is orientated in the direction of the possibility of action, somewhat than only interpretation or thought. The question you're able to ask is WHAT needs to get replaced, why it needs to get replaced, and how Marx thinks it extremely is replaced. Cheers.

2016-12-16 11:42:13 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

No...the point is to change it for the better. He changed it for the worse. And furthermore, although the point of changing it for the better might be more relevent than interpreting. You cannot implement without the analysis and itnerpretation first..all this brainstorming and wisdom we have partaked...will pay later...when we finnally implement our dreams.

As far as standing for principles.. It takes someone with character, on top of the philosophy, to do this. You can do that in your spheres of influence everyday. In your home, in your workplace...not be uptight, but casual, yet firm...and who knows...you may evolve a whole new mindset of way of thinking and being...a better way....

lead us...? I certaintly will propagate my being...as far as changing the world..well, I don't want to be a politician, neither is it necessary..we will do it one step at a time...let politicians squabble the possibilities over time...we will prevail as the light reaches our eyes at the end of the tunnel. We, as people, are the trend-setters.

Ideas flow like water...they will reach us if their compelling enough. And from thought, it necessarily follows our actions....we will act on our thoughts...and thus, we would have changed the world.

2007-01-23 06:29:33 · answer #3 · answered by zack u 1 · 0 0

The point is neither to interpret the world, nor to change it, but to live it. And all of us are doing just that. We need neither philosophers nor social reformers, thank you very much. All we need is to be allowed to experience the world and grow through those experiences, and they are complex enough for that as it is.

2007-01-23 06:41:58 · answer #4 · answered by shades of Bruno 5 · 0 0

Absolutely, we can tell people that we are full of vice and evil, but if we do nothing about it then only the born followers will listen, and none of the leaders.

2007-01-23 06:15:30 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

that is such a beautiful quote. but nonetheless it is an opinion which can have any range of effect on anyone

2007-01-23 08:54:28 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers