Shane, Mikey and Keith just stood in the background - were they just for decoration? I'm guessing they couldn't actually sing . . .
2007-01-23 05:55:00 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Music
I loved Stephen's voice on "No Matter What" - it makes me cry!!
2007-01-23 06:02:45 · update #1
i did to i thought he was brilliant i think that they were just backing vocalists more than anything although they did help write a few songs, boyzone took the pain away from when take that spilt up, but now take that are back together with out robbie boo hoo but i always liked gary anyway. boyzone were really good until they got to the end when there music just went ****** up.
have you been watching stephen in dancing on ice, i think hes great in that too
2007-01-23 06:12:22 · answer #1 · answered by rose_petal_67 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
1
2016-05-07 17:02:15 · answer #2 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because they were a boy band. To be a boy/girl band there has to be a balance of natural talent and eye candy. It's quite rare to get a group comprised of naturally talented eye candy. Look back over the last decade and identify the good singers in such bands, they're never the best looking of the group.
2007-01-23 06:05:08 · answer #3 · answered by forge close folks 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would guess that they could sing, but not as well as the other two and thats why they were more backing singers than lead singers.
2007-01-23 05:58:45 · answer #4 · answered by Denise H 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Winning Your Ex Lover Back : http://ExBack.GoNaturallyCured.com
2016-01-26 23:07:51 · answer #5 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
well mikey actully bought out a solo single called ' angel ' which is a really lovely song and is one of mine and my husbands 'songs' you should try getting it youd be pleasantly suprised trust me...
2007-01-23 06:00:47 · answer #6 · answered by roblou 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
thats just a boy band for you!!
2007-01-23 06:11:09 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋