The next sentence is true. This sentence is false. Contradiction or paradox?

Answer 1

Neither. Sentence one is false.

What you want is:

1. Sentence 2 is false
2. Sentence 1 is true

Answer 2

those situations of the Hardy-Weinberg regulation are hardly ever met, so allele frequencies interior the gene pool of a inhabitants do replace from one era to the subsequent, ensuing in evolution. we are able to now evaluate that any replace of allele frequencies in a gene pool exhibits that evolution has befell. The Hardy-Weinberg regulation proposes those factors that violate the situations listed reason evolution. A Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium supplies you a baseline by which to guage no matter if evolution has befell. Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium is a fidelity of gene pool frequencies this is nevertheless for the time of generations, and can want to maximum perfect be got here across between sturdy populations without organic determination or the position determination is stabilizing. Microevolution is the buildup of small variations in a gene pool over a extremely short era.

Answer 3

Your first statement qualifies your second statement.
It says the next statement is true. so whatever it is, it is true.

So no contradiction and no paradox.

I think your question should be...

"The next sentence is true. The previous sentence is false" :)

Answer 4

It's a contradiction... Because it is a sentence.
It would be a paradox, if you'd have said... This is false

Answer 5

Confusing. Kind of like going crosseyed when you look at striped wallpaper.

Answer 6

paradox

Answer 7

contradiction

Answer 8

contradiction

Answer 9

Neither. You have WAY too much time on your hands. Put it to better use.

Answer 10

Neither. Just way too much time on your hands.