Well, he's determined that everyone will go to University so expect to see your local school rebranded some time soon.
And you've given me an idea ! Army schools ! Everyone could join the army from 16-18 ! I must get on to Tony !
2007-01-23 04:58:12
·
answer #1
·
answered by Well, said Alberto 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
I have this vision of schools surrounded with barbed-wire gun turrets, uniformed guards, alsation dogs and searchilghts, whilst the 5th column dig under the playing fields and the playground.
Mercifully, the lunatic will soon be released into "care in the community."
2007-01-23 05:10:15
·
answer #2
·
answered by musonic 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I can remember the 14 to 16 years extension and it went through with few hitches. It would help this time round to have quality vocational education as on offer in other European states, such as Germany.
2007-01-23 05:07:53
·
answer #3
·
answered by James Mack 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
The Tank is probably right. Let's face it, the lunatic always thinks they are sane and the rest of the world is mad. Tony lost it? Naw. He never had it in the first place.
2007-01-23 05:04:16
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Remember that the man's intelligent, a barrister and highly educated. It's not him that's lost the plot. He must know exactly what he's doing.
It's the rest of us that can't understand what he's up to.
2007-01-23 05:01:00
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
That'll be the teenage pregnancy rate going up again then. don't know what the boys will do though
2007-01-23 05:07:09
·
answer #6
·
answered by Twisty 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
it'll be the teenagers army for those who don't go to uni.Thus keeping the dole figures down
2007-01-23 05:05:41
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
The question we need to be asking is did Tony ever HAVE the plot to lose? Answers on a postcard, please...
2007-01-23 07:22:45
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
did he ever have it
the same way everything else is enforced fines and taxes
2007-01-23 04:59:26
·
answer #9
·
answered by liam0_m 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Great. So I guess this will mean another tax rise to pay for it...
2007-01-23 04:59:52
·
answer #10
·
answered by R Stoofaloh 4
·
0⤊
0⤋