Why do Republicans think IRAQ attacked AMERICA on 911?

Question

proove it fools

Answer 1

Well, I tend to support Republicans, and I know Iraq didn't attack us on 9-11.

People that say that are ignorant. Smarter than those that think Bush or the Jews caused it, but ignorant nonetheless.

Answer 2

first, i'm not a fool.

second, i've yet to see anyone claim this, except people like you who think you can score some kind of points from this question.

we KNOW who attacked us. better than YOU do. and just like Bill Clinton felt back in 1998 and after, Saddam WAS TOO DANGEROUS to be allowed to have any weapons. he acted like he had them and CLINTON thought he did too. go to cnn and look up some speeches he gave on saddam.

President Clinton said that the only way the world could guarantee that Saddam wouldn't acquire WMD's and USE them was to effect a regime change in Iraq. so why doesn't anyone criticize him for SAYING THE SAME THING BACK THEN?

Answer 3

Oil!!

http://thinkprogress.org/2006/08/21/bush-on-911/

Oh they did criticize Clinton back then, especially after Operation Desert Fox where he took out Iraqi military targets with tomahawks and air strikes, getting no one killed! It was REPUBLICANS DOING THE CRITICIZING!


7-30-1996, WASHINGTON -- President Clinton urged Congress Tuesday to act swiftly in developing anti-terrorism legislation before its August recess.

"We need to keep this country together right now. We need to focus on this terrorism issue," Clinton said during a White House news conference.

But while the president pushed for quick legislation, Republican lawmakers hardened their stance against some of the proposed anti-terrorism measures.

Senate Majority Leader Trent Lott, R-Mississippi, doubted that the Senate would rush to action before they recess this weekend. The Senate needs to study all the options, he said, and trying to get it done in the next three days would be tough.

One key GOP senator was more critical, calling a proposed study of chemical markers in explosives "a phony issue."

Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, emerged from the meeting and said, "These are very controversial provisions that the White House wants. Some they're not going to get."

Hatch said the compromise bill would prevent international terrorist organizations from raising money in the United States and provide for the swift deportation of international terrorists.

The Republicans also dropped the additional wire-tap authority the Clinton administration wanted. U.S. Attorney general Janet Reno had asked for "multi-point" tapping of suspected terrorists, who may be using advanced technology to outpace authorities.

Rep. Charles Schumer, D-New York, said technology is giving criminals an advantage. "What the terrorists do is they take one cellular phone, use the number for a few days, throw it out and use a different phone with a different number," he said. "All we are saying is tap the person, not the phone number."

The measure, which the Senate passed overwhelmingly Wednesday evening, is a watered-down version of the White House's proposal. The Clinton administration has been critical of the bill, calling it too weak. AP

Note: The senate was controlled by the republicans in 1996. Trent Lott was the majority leader.

Answer 4

there won't in any respect be yet another attack on US soil till the government comes to a decision to invade yet another u . s . a . and needs to get individuals riled up adequate to help the assumption. If, and observe I say "if" the U. S. comes to a decision to pass away Iraq, that u . s . a . will erupt in a "Civil conflict" which will rival the Rwandan genocide. And the U. S. will have not have been given anybody in charge yet there very own greed.

Answer 5

They don't think that. They manufactured that. It's all there in black and white. Downing Street Memo, Weapons Inspector reports, Joe Wilsons report.

In fact, the very reason that **** Cheney, Scooter Libby, Karl Rove and George Bush comitted treason by out a CIA officer was to shut up Joe Wilson who had proof that what the Whitehouse was telling America was a lie.

This is why they mentioned his CIA wife's name Valerie Plame in an article to expose her and as a warning to him to shut up about Iraq. This was done to give them the time they needed for the rushed lie of a war.

So when people argue that the Bush administration linked Iraq to 9/11, its true. They had to lie about Iraq to invade by using our unification against terror and fears about WMD's.

We were all used. Well everyone except the Bushian's who are for world domination and a NWO fascist state contolled by Contracted hit men they now call police.

Answer 6

Why did the USA fought Italy and Germany when the ones that attack us was Japan in the 2nd. World War. If you answer my question, then you, yourself will answer yours and know who is really the fool. Have a good day..

Answer 7

Bush kept stating that the
"Evidence was the smoking gun in the form of a mushroom cloud".
Not Democrats but Bush and the Republicans. He launched an illegal war on a sovereign nation. He didn't attack Saudi Arabia, home to 17 of the 19 terrorists. He attacked Iraq.
His attack on Afghanistan was justified, his attack on Iraq not.
History has shown this to be his biggest mistake.

Answer 8

Not all Republicans think that. Unfortunately, the most important member of that party wanted us to believe it, resulting in the catastrophe in Iraq today.

Answer 9

We've never said this. This is what is known as liberal propaganda. It's a lie.

But you were gullible enough to believe it. Doesn't say much about your ability to discern fact from fantasy, does it?

Answer 10

Why don't you prove Republicans believe that first?