2007-01-23 03:42:38 · 19 answers · asked by Feelsgood 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
No, they will use Bushblame. Bush will be blamed for everything for the next 100 years, expecially if we continue to let neo-libs infect our schools.
2007-01-23 03:49:46 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 4⤋
Like the responsibility Bush showed when we were attacked on 9/11? Let's see how responsible he was... he let Bin Laden go, waged war in Iraq based on intelligence reports that claimed Iraq were manufacturing weapons of mass destructions... weapons I might add which after three years we've yet to locate... arrest and hang Saddam Hussein, who although was a fascist dictator and a horrible person really posed no threat to our nation or our security and now walks around with a smug look on his face while wading knee-deep in the pile of sh*t he's created.
You are a hateful man, do you know that? Every post you've made in the last month slams liberals. EVERY ONE OF THEM!!!
Liberals ended slavery in this country. It may have been a Republican, but a liberal Republican. What happened to them? What did liberals do that was so offensive to the liberal party? I'll tell you what they did.
Liberals got women the right to vote. Liberals got African-Americans the right to vote. Liberals created Social Security and lifted millions of elderly people out of poverty. Liberals ended segregation. Liberals passed the Civil Rights Act, the Voting Rights Act. Liberals created Medicare. Liberals passed the Clean Air Act, the Clean Water Act. What did Conservatives do? They opposed them on every one of those things... every one.
Liberals stand for change and conservatives are all about, "If it ain't broke, don't fix it!" Well if you'd bother to get your news from a more reliable source than Fox News or The 700 Club, you'd realize that it is in fact broke, and it needs fixing. Who's going to do that? Another conservative buddying up with church groups and right wingers? Not bloody likely, my friend!
2007-01-23 13:35:55 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Did the republicans take responsibility on 9-11? When and if we are attacked, what is the point of blaming one half of our country? And what is the point of asking such divisive questions before such an attack takes place?
Shouldn't we be working together to keep all of us safe?
In the event that "islamofacists" attack American soil, do you honestly think they are going to care who you voted for in the last election?
2007-01-23 11:47:42 · answer #3 · answered by joecool123_us 5 · 4⤊ 1⤋
Calling other Americans hateful liberals is exactly what the REAL terrorists want. Divide and conquer. The minority of neocons who do nothing but rant about liberals are playing into the terrorists hands.
2007-01-23 12:42:23 · answer #4 · answered by wyldfyr 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
No the blame will lie with the man who swelled the ranks of terrorists, who weakened our armed forces, who has wasted billions which could have been better used to combat terrorism. That's right---- George W Bush!
P.S. I sometimes come back and read answers of others and I would have to say Streetpro's answer is one of the best I have ever read.
2007-01-23 11:51:33 · answer #5 · answered by Frank R 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Liberals don't oppose fighting Islamic terrorists. They do oppose fighting them ineffectively, as we have been doing.
The brave men and women who have sacrificed their lives will only have done so in vain if their loss fails to make us see the folly of our current strategy.
2007-01-23 11:50:23 · answer #6 · answered by lunatic 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
It will be blamed on America's easiest target for blame right now... Bush. That's right our president, the one who, by the way, stepped up security in the US thus preventing further attacks.
When a lib gets in office and we get attacked here on our soil then we will all know who to blame, our selves for being so mislead by the media.
How many of you libs have close family in Iraq?
My cousin, bro.-in-law, and best friend are over there and all of them think that it is necessary to be there in order to KEEP the terrorist violence over there.
2007-01-23 12:00:31 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
Only if they attack your house. Then I will except full responsibility.
2007-01-23 11:49:59 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
There's no such thing as an 'islamofascist" no matter what they say on Fox News.
We'll take as much responsibilty for future attacks as Bush has for 9-11.
2007-01-23 11:49:06 · answer #9 · answered by bettysdad 5 · 4⤊ 3⤋
Ask a serious question.
Everybody already knows that liberals never take responsibility for anything.
2007-01-23 11:53:40 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋