Bush has made some terrible policy decisions, anyone can see that, which he is obviously to blame for, along with his advisors. Blaming him for global warming, rising oil prices, declining oil prices, and other things like the media does is absurd. Now, when he is gone and the world still turns, can it be fair to say that he will continue to be blamed for things? In 2008 the Democrats will win, because of everything that has gone wrong, I think the 2006 elections were the turning point and future of this country. Now, when the Democrats get in office, will they continue to blame Bush for their policy decisions if they go wrong? Will the media bash them if that happens, or "just blame Bush" because its easy? I voted for Bush but I just want him out ASAP so we can see if the media will blame a Democratic Administration if their policy fails. I think when they do win and something goes wrong, they will spin it and make it look positive. What do you think?
2007-01-23 03:35:55 · 11 answers · asked by Derrick 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
YES
2007-01-23 03:38:33 · answer #1 · answered by jenny 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Obviously, the Democrats need to take responsibility for turning things around. They need to come up with real solutions, and just blaming the Bush administration is not enough.
That said, it is a lot to expect them (or anyone) to repair the damage the Bush administration has caused. There are no good solutions left in Iraq. Let's be honest: if U.S. troops stay in there, it will be a disaster; if they leave, that would be a disaster too. So, no matter what the new government does, things are going to look pretty bad.
I hate to just blame Bush but he did put us in a very bad spot.
2007-01-23 11:43:25 · answer #2 · answered by Danny 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Are you saying that if we are all in a room and unanimously make a decision and the decision turns out to be wrong, then only one of us is to blame?
We all make mistakes and Bush is no exception but his initial decisions were supported by Congress and the American people. We can't have our cake and eat it too.
2007-01-23 11:47:08 · answer #3 · answered by Jay J 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
You can blame who you like but most of the rest of the world blames the 51% of Americans that voted for him. Having said that you didn't have much of a choice but whose fault was that. If rich Dads can buy their kids the presidency now, again, whose fault is that.
2007-01-23 11:44:50 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, the sheeple and their neo-lib Inner Party masters have a free-pass in the form of Bushate forever.
2007-01-23 11:39:12 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
This sounds just like the kind of blame-game I like!
Republicans need to remember; what goes around, comes around!
2007-01-23 11:44:12 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Since republicans and neo-cons did the same thing with Clinton, I guess turnaround is fair game.
2007-01-23 11:39:15 · answer #7 · answered by anon 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
We can blame, him, then we can blame my best friend daniel Vonhurbulis cause hes bad luck.
2007-01-23 11:39:52 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It is so cold outside today. That darn Bush. He is so powerful.
2007-01-23 11:39:57 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Oh, if only it were that simple. Bush is a sock puppet.
2007-01-23 11:40:07 · answer #10 · answered by anya_mystica 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well yeah....its his fault the country is the way it is.
2007-01-23 11:40:26 · answer #11 · answered by Liya J 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋