The rabbid Right has created so many domestic atrocities with the "war" on drugs and the war on people who are not religious fanatic(all in the name of money),isnt it nice that we have imported right-wing success to Iraq,complete with atrocities?
Now that more Americans have died in Iraq than on 9-11,how can we create more swell conservative atrocities?
Aint Bush and his robotic fan club a bunch of geniouses?
2007-01-23
03:22:57
·
13 answers
·
asked by
Cut The Crap
2
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
Chuckles: Its intelligence that makes me ask.
Get a clue,reactionary.
2007-01-23
03:28:10 ·
update #1
According to these on Yahoo Q & A they are very proud of all the destruction they have caused and they thrill when they think of all the innocent civilians that have been murdered and maimed.
2007-01-23 03:28:16
·
answer #1
·
answered by Brotherhood 7
·
0⤊
4⤋
Thanks for demonstrating the complete lack of intellectual capacity on the RABID left-wing.
1. Why do you "feel" ("think" being wholly inappropriate for you) it was conservatives only who created the war on drugs? Some of the worst expansions of tyranny due to the war on drugs were passed by Democrat congresses.
2. War on the non-religious? On which planet?
3. What "atrocities" did we export to Iraq, pray tell? I'd be very interested in hearing this fairy tale.
4. And that's "genius" to you, Einstein.
2007-01-23 03:40:30
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
As a real veteran, i stumble on B as worth of more suitable criticism. all of us with a psychological situation can pretend to be a conflict hero, even though it takes someone with a slimy agenda and moral experience to tug off a pretend interview. self sufficient. on the properly of the day we are only individuals. certainly, that is nerve-racking that any American would communicate poorly of their united states of america, even though it type of feels to be almost all of media on the prompt. i'm able to't even watch the on a daily basis instruct anymore with out some anti-bush anti-conflict agenda being thrown in my face. this isn't a wonder in any respect coming from the liberal media.
2016-10-15 23:52:45
·
answer #3
·
answered by mccarty 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, sadly I don't think anyone likes our soldiers dying. Domestic atrocities, please provide the info to back your kool-aid drinking statement. Are you neo-libs pleased with Iraqi citizens having a democracy in which even women can vote and did. Are you pleased that kids can go to school in new class rooms, people are being fed, and that the fact we are rebuilding that country? Did you want to see more Kurds die. Another country such as kuwait overtaken and people die. Your freedom to type bogus statements on Y A. What is your plan sir.
2007-01-23 03:41:06
·
answer #4
·
answered by mbush40 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
The conservatives are dismayed at the atrocities of our enemies. And the terrorists alone bear the responsibility for those atrocities.
You're aptly named. Take your own medicine.
2007-01-23 03:34:06
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
I don't think the conservatives like atrocities - but it is their willingness to accept them in the name of an overhyped "war" on _____ that is so disturbing.
2007-01-23 03:33:15
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
The basic problem is that the conservative robots don't understand the years of politics behind the terrorism...the administration does, but they bank on the fact that most people don't. (Thank you 'fake-liberal' media). So when people and soldiers are slaughtered, everyone chalks it up to those crazy "Islamofascists."
2007-01-23 03:38:53
·
answer #7
·
answered by Pete Schwetty 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
I don't think either side is pleased with atrocities anywhere. What I am appalled at is that you seem to think you are so much better.
2007-01-23 03:29:39
·
answer #8
·
answered by CL R 3
·
3⤊
0⤋
1. N O!!
2. N O!!
3.Elect more liberal democrats to office!!
4. N O!!!!!!
2007-01-23 03:30:18
·
answer #9
·
answered by Vagabond5879 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
Sounds like ranting and raving to me. I'll bet it's a case of Bushate. Only ont thing can cure that, intelligence.
Good luck, scarecrow.
Edit: Sure it is... paluka.
2007-01-23 03:27:23
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋