I think she would do a fine job, but it strikes me as unamerican for the whitehouse to be controlled for a potential of 28 years by the same two families. What say you?
2007-01-23 03:16:33 · 10 answers · asked by abcdefghijk 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I'm no Republican, I'd would just like some fresh blood for the presidency.
2007-01-23 03:41:37 · update #1
I agree with you to a point - but its funny that didnt stop people from electing Bush twice, let alone once. Therefore nobody can tell the Clintons they shouldnt.
2007-01-23 03:21:58 · answer #1 · answered by radiancia 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Bush! At least Clinton took out Hussein's military targets in Operation Desert Fox, and didn't get a damn person on our side killed!
You must be a Republican. You also didn't mention Bush was vice-president as well!
Easy for you to say when the Dem's have had 8 and you the rest! Please don't count Hillary as she has not been elected.
The same party that wrote "term limits" but wanted to lift them for Bush!
This street is not one-way!!
2007-01-23 03:24:26 · answer #2 · answered by cantcu 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
i'm a Paul supporter. the finished gadget has me uninterested. i'm ill of listening to all information promote Romney & Giuliani for over a three hundred and sixty 5 days now...they are literally electing the candidate. Hillary is trash, yet so is a neocon Giuliani. because of that, i will not vote for Giuliani. If i will not vote for Ron Paul, if i will not write in his call, i will not vote in any respect. as far as im in touch, enable hillary win, and it is going to coach that conservatives and libertarians and constitutionalists are ill of the mainstream reviews forced down our throats. it is going to also shwo that the republicans want to regulate some issues next time round in the adventure that they want to win. it would want to help kill the present neocon "im a 40 5% democrat republican" additude.
2016-12-02 22:46:47 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think she would be a sorry excuse for a president but it has nothing to do with her name. I don't want to see her or a Bush in office this time around. I think it is time for a change in the way things are done by the administration.
2007-01-23 03:23:28 · answer #4 · answered by joevette 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
We already had 8 years of her, we shouldn't have to suffer like that again.
2007-01-23 03:31:29 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Especially too many Clinton years. She would be a horrible pres because she is way too liberal and then she lies about being a moderate!
It's bad enough that we have to listen to her shrill voice and look at that ugly mug on TV as a Senator.
2007-01-23 03:21:21 · answer #6 · answered by Dizney 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
We do not need her in office. It is too many years of a couple of families.
2007-01-23 03:20:07 · answer #7 · answered by CL R 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
look at her for her own merit.. not her name.. if that would have been done with Bush we'd be in a safer America right now.
2007-01-23 03:26:52 · answer #8 · answered by pip 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I wouldn't worry, as I think support for Hillary will fadeas time wears on
2007-01-23 03:20:38 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
If she does a good job, what's the difference? That's just propaganda.
2007-01-23 03:21:07 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋