Iraq (not some radical liberal Democrat) do you think it might be wise for Bush to take his advice? (Senator John Warner is the that congressman who gave Bush that advice. He is also the Chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations commitee).
2007-01-23 02:34:49 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Warner's good advice has fallen on deaf ears.
.
2007-01-23 02:40:09 · answer #1 · answered by Brotherhood 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
you're transforming into checked a lot, however the national debt did no longer advance from 5 to 7.40 5 trillion in 2007. It grow to be 8.7 Trillion on the initiating of 2007 and 9.2 trillion on the top. nonetheless a number of money yet no the place close to what you claimed. EDIT: Are you severe? You talk approximately 2007 and the upward push in that 12 months and then change to talking approximately Bush's finished tenure. next time, why do no longer YOU furnish your source, then take somewhat greater time to place out your question so as which you won't be able to be seen as attempting to curve the information. i admire the way you assert that there is "prevalent contract" to assist your information. Does capitalizing the "U" supply some greater effective which skill, like "i truly, truly do no longer understand what i'm talking approximately so please do no longer undertaking me on the information." There you go, merely between the aspects below you're able to have used.
2016-11-26 20:59:30 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It is wise to listen but because someone is respected doesn't mean they are correct. I also hear people make the argument that the majority think, this also doesn't mean correct.
Instead of taking the advice he should ask why does Warner say this. Does it fit the goal (to win) Bush has? Will it get him to the goal faster, cheaper, better, etc?
2007-01-23 02:42:38 · answer #3 · answered by sfavorite711 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bush should consider the source and the intent.
He is a senator that is primarily focused on senate foreign relations, which translates to "worried about the US reputation".
Bush has higher priority concerns than how the senate is viewed by foreigners.
2007-01-23 02:38:59 · answer #4 · answered by Ricky T 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I saw his plan on CNN last night. His idea is that Americans should only be used to protect the borders of Iraq and should be sent to Anbar Province, where Al Queda is still prevalent. He said the Iraqis should be responsible for securing Baghdad and ending the sectarian violence, as Americans have no place in the middle of a civil war. His idea made a lot of sense to me. He said no increase in troops would be necessary under his plan, as Americans would not be involved in the fighting in Baghdad. he said he made these decisions based on a trip to Iraq, where he saw the problems firsthand.
2007-01-23 02:41:34 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
If you recall the elections, it was Kerry who suggested a troop increase, along with several other liberals. Also, G.W. Bush is a moderate not a conservative and why exactly is Warner so respected? You have to secure Baghdad in order to allow the Iraqi government to progress unhindered.
The Dems were right then and Bush is right now. Its funny how the Dems who suggested it in 2004 are condemning Bush for it now.
I friggen hate fare weather fans!!
2007-01-23 02:38:31 · answer #6 · answered by Centurion529 4 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Bush made the troop increase plan based upon advise form Generals on the ground, his advisors and other Senators, it was not made in a vacuum.
2007-01-23 02:39:48 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
No, not when he has more information, and better advice.
how many congressmen are there?
What did he advise to do? What was his answer? Keep things the same? Pull troops out?
Why do you want to ignore all the advice from democrats who told him there weren't enough troops there? Do they change their mind when the president actually does something about it?
2007-01-23 02:39:35 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
It would be very wise. Even wiser to allow Sen. Warner to give him alternatives. However, Bush isn't exactly known for listening to ANYONE.
2007-01-23 02:41:11 · answer #9 · answered by T S 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
No one ever accused Bush of being wise.
2007-01-23 02:38:59 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋