2007-01-23 01:56:21 · 6 answers · asked by hungryofedinburgh 1 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
i have known people who have had one at 30,,, and others who have had one at 65,,, its not really about age,,,,,, its about when you reach the point where you analyze your life, what have you /havent you done, what goals you want to meet,,,,, it really also doesnt have to be a crisis,,,, rather then getting all intense about it and making radical changes,,, i would/did just decide what things i wanted, and added those into the life i already had
as to getting all crazy about it, i dont think that is ever acceptable at any age,
2007-01-23 02:08:48 · answer #1 · answered by dlin333 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't think that society necessarily deems an age for a mid-life crisis. BUT, I would say from a statistical point of view that between 40 and 50 would be the best age for one of those. However, if you take the literal translation, you could never know when your mid-life crisis will hit; that is, of course, unless you know when you are going to die. And if you know that, point me in the direction where I can get that information.
2007-01-23 10:05:08 · answer #2 · answered by johnmfsample 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
45
2007-01-23 10:03:36 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
I don't think there's an exact age..it depends on what is going on in your life and what's surrounding you...so it could be any age...
2007-01-23 12:57:12 · answer #4 · answered by greentara04 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
when you no at what age you are going to die then half it and that is when you can do it .o/ya nobody can no when they well die so no won can have a mid life eposode .
2007-01-23 11:30:50 · answer #5 · answered by henryredwons 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
any age, im having one now at 29
2007-01-23 10:15:37 · answer #6 · answered by messiahdem 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋