2007-01-23 01:44:51 · 40 answers · asked by Sharky Vl 5 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
I have to remember that one. No, I would rather be imperfect...more challenging.
2007-01-23 01:47:56 · answer #1 · answered by ÐIESEŁ ÐUB 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I LOVE THAT! That is a great point. Most definitely i would rather be a nobody then trying to be perfect because it will never happen.
2007-01-30 08:02:57 · answer #2 · answered by oliphantheather 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No because even someone considered a nobody is somebody. Plus I'd rather strive for perfection.
2007-01-23 01:48:45 · answer #3 · answered by Nico 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
' I don't know this nobody who is perfect, but I know nobody who isn't'. Therefore every nobody is perfect whether I know them or not.
2007-01-27 13:18:17 · answer #4 · answered by Sid S 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nobody's somebody to everybody.
2007-01-23 01:47:59 · answer #5 · answered by ? 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Well if i am any example being a nobody isn't so great!
2007-01-30 08:54:59 · answer #6 · answered by Jesse 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I am a nobody. Thank you, I didn't realise I was quite so perfect! xx
2007-01-26 08:32:15 · answer #7 · answered by maria bartoninfrance 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
if you don't have a body, being a nobody, how can you be perfect?
if that's the case, I rather not be perfect, and have a body ;-)
2007-01-23 01:51:58 · answer #8 · answered by Frank the tank 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
nobodys do not exist,the term was invented to establish a condition with people to enable them to change the way they feel,and fall into the trap of grandiosity
2007-01-23 01:49:49 · answer #9 · answered by meditation and mango juice 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No...it's better to be a somebody who isn't perfect
2007-01-23 01:50:24 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, its always better to be a somebody who knows their not perfect.
2007-01-23 01:49:01 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋