English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Read this: http://www.snopes.com/politics/war/apo.asp

OK so the hot head at the office writes the nasty email back to this poor guy in Iraq who just wants something comfortable to sleep on.
Yet put in their digs at the troops. Is that person excerise their "Free Speech" while on the job and shouldn't lose it.

Those who are countering and giving this company hell over that email are they excersing their "Free Speech" rights too in counter protest.

Either way you feel about this war how about we all try to make it as comfortable as we can for those guys and leave this petty politics to those here.

2007-01-23 01:38:22 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

4 answers

I don't know about the guys saying you don't believe everything on the internet is true.
However this story is showing up in more than one place and varitiy of people are reporting.
http://www.earlyspinblog.com/

http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=173711

http://blogsearch.google.com/blogsearch?q=Sgt.+Hess&hl=en&lr=&sa=X&oi=blogsearch&ct=title

2007-01-23 04:23:40 · answer #1 · answered by Max50 7 · 0 0

Free Speech is a personal matter. The writer certainly is entitled to hold and express an opinion but whether he/she can do it on company time is a company matter. The writer was acting as an agent of the company and therefore representing the company, not his/herself. There is no free speech in such a role.

The responder should be fired. Not for the opinon but because he/she is horrible at customer service.

2007-01-23 09:48:50 · answer #2 · answered by Bill S 3 · 0 0

Many men suffer from erectile dysfunction (ED) -- the inability to achieve and sustain an erection long enough to have enjoyable and fulfilling sex. For a variety of reasons ED is most common in men over 45. The sex drive is often lowered even further in older men who are taking medications of various kinds.
Most of us assume the sex drive gradually diminishes as we get older, so we are prepared to accept ED as a natural condition. But the fact is, the inability for many men to sustain an erection may be more the result of treatable physical conditions rather than an actual loss of sex drive.
Until the early 1980s most people -- including most trained urologists -- assumed that ED was basically a mental or psychological problem. But in 1983 at a presentation to the American Urological Association, Dr. Gilbert M demonstrated that a penis could be made erect by injecting it with the drug phentolamine. In a public demonstration, he used his own penis to make the point.
Gil had discovered that the penis could be made erect by relaxing the normally constricted blood vessels leading into it. Once the blood vessels are relaxed, they let in more blood and the penis inflates something like a balloon to form an erection.
http://www.super-cialis.com
http://www.cialis-uk.com
http://www.pharmagenic.com

2013-10-08 22:41:32 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

quit believing everything you read on the internet.

2007-01-23 09:57:35 · answer #4 · answered by qncyguy21 6 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers