English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

11 answers

The technological knowledge is out there; Lichtenstein could do it. It's a question of coming up with the resources and infrastructure-- building a spacecraft, constructing a launch site, establishing a communications network, and so on. This all costs money, and the big question is, is India prepared to divert resources from other areas to pay for it?

2007-01-23 01:28:21 · answer #1 · answered by gamblin man 6 · 0 0

Yesterdays re-entry of our satellite back to earth (rocket launched 12 days ago from Sriharikota) is the first step towards sending manned spacecraft.

2007-01-23 02:01:28 · answer #2 · answered by Ramesh M 3 · 0 0

The moon touchdown software became element of a political attempt to triumph over the U.S. interior the chilly conflict with out the choose for international nuclear conflict. That became all it ever became and while the venture had added what it became meant to, no added efforts have been funded. right this moment, the recent moon touchdown software is many times a taxpayer funded company welfare software for the U. S. aerospace marketplace. like the ISS it particularly is going to waste hundreds of billions of greenbacks on an pointless attempt with little instant scientific fee. interior of NASA there is, although, a properly often happening actuality: not one of the particularly effective technology classes might have ever befell with out the waste of the manned classes. it particularly is the manned classes which permit aerospace agencies to strengthen the technologies to make extreme reliability launch platforms that propel our robotic planetary probes. There could be no Hubble with out the shuttle simply by fact the shuttle software needed a technology venture to cover up the inevitable actuality that that's a porking software. The ISS, in that regard, is an extremely undesirable motor vehicle politically, simply by fact it would not have the kind of cover (different than for the multinational collaboration piece which grew to become right into a US investment nightmare). the recent moon touchdown software, on the different hand, is super, simply by fact it restores US nationalist delight at no longer lots greater advantageous than the fee of what we've been spending on the shuttle software, besides, keeps the aerospace marketplace satisfied, that are then greasing the GOP and it will furnish new extremely-heavy launch automobiles for technology. the floor technology laboratories for the icy moons of the outer planets and the super area telescopes of the destiny will all be waiting to piggy-back rides on Ares I and Ares V rockets. and thanks to this we truthfully ought to circulate back to the moon: so the incredibly sensible scientists get a huge gamble to circulate the place we incredibly need to circulate: to the outer planets and their moons, the asteroid belt and... sooner or later to the celebs... on beams of historical easy accrued by using vast telescopes floating in area.

2016-12-12 18:22:51 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Technically capable? Certainly, India has the people and engineering expertise to accomplish such a goal. I suspect the bigger issues would be political and financial capabilities.

2007-01-23 03:47:43 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Perhaps eventually given the time but India is not close to having that technology today.

2007-01-23 01:18:49 · answer #5 · answered by Gene 7 · 0 0

Even the Dineh are capable of this. But why would we want to?

2007-01-23 01:20:21 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Yes why not we have man power we have scientists engineers

2007-01-23 01:23:39 · answer #7 · answered by RAHUL K 1 · 0 0

why not? it is not a race issue but a capability issue

2007-01-23 01:16:58 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

c'mon maan...asians are the most genius in the whole world.

2007-01-23 01:23:38 · answer #9 · answered by tonima 4 · 0 0

it would make Geronimo proud

2007-01-23 01:41:31 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers