English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

If I were a Democratic candidate running for president, I would be crying foul.

2007-01-23 00:12:27 · 6 answers · asked by ? 7 in News & Events Media & Journalism

6 answers

Well...... Lets consider that the Clinton's ARE liars...... and I'm certainly NOT voting for this Clinton package of lies!

Hillary has high negative ratings. There are a lot of people that REALLY dislike her these are a few of the reasons:

-- Hillary is the liberal media's sweetheart, but not America's sweatheart
-- The Clintons LIE and her husband was impeached for lying and committing purjury
-- Her failed healthcare program under her husband
-- Her shrieking voice that grates on people
-- She doesn't look presidential
-- She is very liberal even more than her husband, but bends (lies) politically to pick up votes and reverts back. This is called a "phony."
-- This would bring her husband back into politics and many people do not like that idea.
-- Her husband also has high negative approval ratings.
-- White Water fraud

We've had almost twenty years of the clinton-bush dynasty. Aren't we ready for a freakin break? If we vote in the shrieking b-i-t-c-h, the dynasty could go to almost THIRTY years. Then Jeb Bush could add another eight years??!

Please, we need a change!!!
.
.

2007-01-23 00:16:09 · answer #1 · answered by charles 3 · 3 1

She has already been in the White House, she just used the 'hers' towel instead of the 'his'. I won't support her or downplay her hard work. I'm not afraid of having a woman president. I don't think i'll vote for her, not because of her political party, because of the inconsistencies she has demonstrated.
(By the way, the party system we have is as antiquated as our voting procedures. Somebody brilliant fix it already.)
Hillary's name is all over the news. The only foul thing about that is we need someone else out there too who can handle the job as president. I think she can handle it. She's smart, shrewd, and definitely has it all over her husband.

2007-01-23 05:52:20 · answer #2 · answered by Konswayla 6 · 0 0

Why all the media attention for the first ever female front-runner for nomination? Are you serious?

To answer the gentleman above:
-- Her failed healthcare program under her husband

(It was destroyed by the Ripig Majority - you can thank them)

-- Her shrieking voice that grates on people
-- She doesn't look presidential

(Genius - great way to make a decision - I guess you voted for Bush, thanks)

-- She is very liberal even more than her husband, but bends (lies) politically to pick up votes and reverts back. This is called a "phony."

(You presume to know her true intentions? Ha.)

-- This would bring her husband back into politics and many people do not like that idea.

(Try reading the 2000 state of the union, or watch it on YouTube - Clinton was the best Prez of our lifetimes)

-- Her husband also has high negative approval ratings.
(He is one of the most beloved Americans worldwide, actually)

-- White Water fraud
(NOT GUILTY - but 1/2 the GOP is in jail)

Just get your facts straight. I don't know who I will vote for, but I will not let any more misinformation into my decision.

2007-01-23 00:41:30 · answer #3 · answered by justagirl33552 4 · 0 1

truthfully, we don't stay in a democracy, we live in a representative republic. A democracy is 3 wolves and a sheep balloting on what to consume for dinner. A republic is 3 wolves and a sheep balloting on what to have for dinner, there's a regulation against ingesting sheep and the sheep is armed. That aside, i do no longer think of it extremely is lots the Clinton camp feeling entitled because it extremely is the Clinton camp feeling stabbed interior the back via the media. It extremely has been the media that has pushed Obama's upward push to prominence and the media that's pushing so difficult for Clinton to drop out. the main reason Clinton maintains to be interior the race is by using the fact she nevertheless has a competent shot at prevailing. each and every of the persevering with subjects with Rezko and Wright aside, there remains the subject of MI and FL with their 350 delegates. in the event that they are seated in something drawing close the truthfully consequences, Obama’s lead shrinks to a handful. 2nd, there are nevertheless approximately one hundred eighty delegates to be chosen in 5 races. third, and maximum severely, THE SUPERDELEGATE COUNTS for each CANDIDATE ARE beside the point AND MEANINGLESS!! enable me to describe. below democratic party regulations, the superdelegates are no longer locked into their decision till the convention while they actually vote. they are unfastened to alter their vote although oftentimes they desire. they are able to circulate to Clinton from Obama, to Obama from Clinton, or back and forth a dozen situations, it is not significant. the only count huge variety that counts is the single in August on the convention. as a result, all 795 superdelegates are “in play”. And just to make it greater exciting, Obama leads Clinton via much less then the variety of at present not sure superdelegates. till each and every of the SDs make up their minds, they do no longer seem to be basically in play, yet ripe for Clinton to bribe, I propose, convince to vote for her. to that end, it extremely is lots too early for her to drop out.

2016-12-16 11:24:35 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

For the news to promote Hillary as Pres is like saying the plague is coming, it should be against the law the purposely scare people

2007-01-23 00:38:49 · answer #5 · answered by Ibredd 7 · 2 1

I keep the remote control close to tune her out just as quickly as I can.

2007-01-23 00:44:47 · answer #6 · answered by what? 3 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers