if not, with so called intelligent humans with technology at their fingertips, why are we expected to believe a cow came about by sheer chance.
2007-01-22
23:58:09
·
8 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Science & Mathematics
➔ Biology
sorry but nobody seems to be answering the question. it's not the fact that humans produce milk as said by eugene, which is irrelevant to the question, but can "intelligent" humans carry out this seemingly simple task, without the aid of already living elements such as blood etc.
and tmprrly to say that i have been giving everybody the thumbs down is a very sweeping statement, if you notice they all have thumbs up too. and leviathan, for somebody with a very biblical moniker you seem very opposed to freeness of speech.
2007-01-23
01:10:45 ·
update #1
Are you talking about cow milk or any type of milk? I'd say good luck with that machine. Best machine is the cow. You need the bacteria to break down the cellulose, and the cow to convert that energy into milk.
2007-01-23 12:03:42
·
answer #1
·
answered by gibbie99 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
As far as I know it would be very difficult to produce a machine to manufacture cows milk from grass. It would be very difficult if not impossible to get the complete mix of chemical compounds that make up cows milk, that's why it's probably best left to them.
If you believe Darwin, then cows came about by natural selection and evolution, if you don't believe Darwin then yes, cows may have been 'designed' by some higher intelligence. But, remember that cows didn't originally produce milk for humans, they produce it to feed their young, as do all other mammals.
2007-01-23 08:06:58
·
answer #2
·
answered by Timbo 3
·
2⤊
1⤋
Not yet. However, it is very much possible to make a bio reactor to do some thing like that. Diary farms of future will look like:
Series of Udder boxes - arranged in 3 dimensional matrix with Blood circulating in them. The cell in them work hard to make milk which will flow straight into carton machines.
The trygliceride feed in the blood determine if are making low fat milk or full fat milk.
It may be possible for you to buy a home version of this machine with an occassional "MOO" sound - indicating an alarm for low food level in blood. etc
2007-01-23 08:06:41
·
answer #3
·
answered by RMG 3
·
2⤊
1⤋
You are completely sick!!
People are giving you the right answers and you're giving them all a thumbs down.
Don't mind, but are you Hindu? If you are or even if you are not you should try to accept that all people would not believe the world to be the same as you believe it to be. Everyone doesn't look for logic for their beleifs, and the ones who look for logic have got different evidences on which they build up their beleifs, while even the evidences are mostly not true.
2007-01-23 08:58:24
·
answer #4
·
answered by tmprrlyTrysta 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
No. Cows need much more than grass to "make" milk. Milk contains plenty of proteins and vitamins, grass contains only cellulose. Therefore it is impossible to make grass into milk. Also you asked this question because you were under the impression that cows eat only grass, well here's an article that might change that bias (http://www.notmilk.com/forum/859.html):
Nearly seventy-nine percent of cows are fed sodium
bicarbonate. Greater than half of the cows in America
receive selenium, yeast, and magnesium oxide. More than one
third of America's dairy cows take supplements including
zinc methionine, niacin, anionic salts, and tallow (rendered
fat) from their deceased brothers and sisters.
Forty-eight percent of dairy cows are fed roasted soybeans!
Yummm. Thirty-nine percent receive dried blood from their
own brutally murdered children, mothers, sisters, and aunts.
Makes me sick to my stomach.
Fifteen percent receive ground-up fish. Ever see a cow
working a trout stream? Four percent of cows eat feathers.
Don't let a cow near your down comforter. Two percent of
cows are fed pork!!!
So you see, cows eat much more than grass, and it is these things that make cow crap so much. Therefore I can say, to answer your question, cows poo so much because they eat so much pork.
Thank you.
2007-01-23 08:10:58
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
Then how do you explain that all mammals produce milk including humans. Doesn't that imply a common origin? Wouldn't that be redundant having them all do the same thing ?
2007-01-23 08:03:06
·
answer #6
·
answered by Gene 7
·
4⤊
1⤋
Yes most all living things regardless of how different are still the same, two eyes, two nostrils, two ears, one mouth and all in mush the same orientation. One maker one designer
2007-01-23 08:11:54
·
answer #7
·
answered by Ibredd 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
You total idiot. Reported.
2007-01-23 08:23:20
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋