English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

rigid constitution requires a long and difficult procedure for ammendment while a flexible constitution is changed like how an ordinary law is changed

2007-01-22 23:24:35 · 2 answers · asked by maine 1 in Politics & Government Law & Ethics

2 answers

As with all liberties and flexilities. It all comes down to how good 'the people' are able to respond in an appropriate manner to change.

You might want to do some research into Hofstede's cultural differences. Things like uncertainty avoidance, masculity. That can explain why certain countries choose for a more rigid model and some for a more flexible one.

2007-01-22 23:37:44 · answer #1 · answered by Job van de Sande 2 · 0 0

A Constitution, by its nature and purpose is not supposed to be flexible. If it is flexible, it is useless.

2007-01-22 23:33:22 · answer #2 · answered by John H 6 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers