why send only 20,000 more troops? why not send the entire US military and then some....i mean u have over 100,000 troops in iraq fighting al qaeda and u still cant beat them....so like al zawahiri said...why not send the entire army...navy...air force....nuclear weapons...missiles...coast guard and even a few million of the US population....i mean it will take everything and more to beat the iraqi insurgents.....i dont think america is a superpower anymore...i mean they cant even stop these insurgents....useless.....send the guns...the machines....the flesh...the blood....send them all....lets see if the entire US military can beat the little iraqi insurgents....hey u might wanna use ur nuclear weapons cause thats the only way i think america can win....even that i have my doubts...surely the US cant lose this war...or have they already? the US is losing everything these days...and the americans celebrate beating little old saddam and his poofter so called military!! what a joke!!!
2007-01-22 22:59:13 · 9 answers · asked by gilly 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
who's gonna protect your country mate...., why dont bush send him self and lead the war jut like captain winters in Band Of Brothers..., well that's my opinion....
2007-01-22 23:08:53 · answer #1 · answered by J J 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Bush can't even send the 20,000 without faking the numbers. The weapons makers don't make any money on soldiers, so they have been replacing them for years with more and more expensive, more and more high tech gadgetry. Their idea was that we would be fighting the next war by video game.
They were as right about that as about everything else.
2007-01-23 00:59:40 · answer #2 · answered by Dragon 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Does Al qaeda have oil? No. So why would Bush be interested in Al qaeda?
Nope, Al qaeda can plan their next big event and Bush will be happily picking away at a country that had absolutely nothing to do with 9/11. And that just makes sense doesn't it?
2007-01-22 23:54:47 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Turkey and u.s. are allies... the genocide bill will no longer substitute that and particularly isn't grounds for a conflict. If the U.S. comes to a decision to combat Iran, which will particularly set off international conflict 3. Russia gets entangled and likely connect them. North Korea will needless to say make the main of this and that i'm beneficial China would be against us (no longer inevitably with Iran) and it will purely be the top of the international.
2016-11-01 01:51:57 · answer #4 · answered by doti 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Cause it would mean that all of the rich desk jockeys who run the show might get shot...
Not just the grunts who George W sends to their fate.
Best thing is send the politicians who support it to fight it out with the enemy ( and let them fight alongside their families)
Id like to see that.
2007-01-22 23:09:52 · answer #5 · answered by satnee2003 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
If al qaeda all lived in alqaedastand they would have been defeated a long time ago , but its a wee bit more complicated than that.
2007-01-22 23:10:16 · answer #6 · answered by oldtreeplanter 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
because Bush does not want to deaeat al quieda, otherwise hed on never invaded Iraq until he had killed or captured bun ladden
2007-01-22 23:19:03 · answer #7 · answered by paulisfree2004 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Spoken like an ignorant, small minded, filled, treasonous little defeatist.
2007-01-22 23:15:16 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
why dont you get your head out of your ****
2007-01-22 23:12:58 · answer #9 · answered by boney 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋