2007-01-22 22:59:10 · 3 answers · asked by ramsundar 5 in Arts & Humanities ➔ History
The British subjects that fought for Independence from the Monarchy were immigrants to the continent. The Natives were already here and were trying to keep the immigrants from stealing what they already had.
There's the difference and it is a real big one.
2007-01-22 23:32:21 · answer #1 · answered by the old dog 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The American revoultion occurred around 1776 with our constitutional forefathers signing the Declaration of Independance.
I'm not sure what your're reference to the "Indian Freedom Fight" is, however, around the late 1700's early 1800's King Phillip united a large amount of Indians for one final push against those who resided in America. "Last of the Moheicans," "Upon the Captivity of Mary Rowlandson", and "Traits of An Indian" were books written about this uprising and the native people. Although King Phillip did a lot of damage, disease and superior weaponry decimated the rebellion, causing thousands more native american deaths than colonists.
2007-01-23 01:03:53 · answer #2 · answered by doomed 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i think there is no difference...they both are struggles against colonial management
2007-01-22 23:09:07 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋