2007-01-22 19:14:43 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Can't see any reason for it.
2007-01-22 19:16:33 · answer #1 · answered by Chief BaggageSmasher 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
That is a very volatile question you are asking.
The precedent for allowing this 'freedom' to happen would undermine just about every group and holding worldwide.
Think about it, Quebec (a predominantly French-speaking Canadian territory) breaks away from Canada. Imagine asking the same thing about Calaveras County in Texas or Cumberland County in North Carolina....... or even Washington D.C. saying it no longer wants to be a part of the state it resides in or the nation of America.
That would be like Bavaria saying it is no longer part of Germany or Tokyo saying it no longer part of Japan.
Certain things are possible and certain other things are not possible....
Quebec being a separate nation is one of those things that is just not possible...... and not even 'right' to think about in the first place.
2007-01-22 19:20:24 · answer #2 · answered by wolf560 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
It's not likely but there is a possibility that one of the future prime ministers may consider it. Most of Canada was founded by the french, although i live in ontario i think that separating quebec from the rest of canada would make canada incomplete. What does quebec want to separate for? what will they gain? how much will they lose? There is a lot to consider.
2007-01-22 19:19:58 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
If Quebec wants to leave Canada all they have to do is have a national vote that includes all Canadians
2007-01-22 19:18:10 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
the next(i hope)french president of the french republic a woman named segolene royal thinks is good for the quebec to be free
.VIVE LE QUEBEC LIBRE
a frenchman who loves the canada country
2007-01-23 01:35:18 · answer #5 · answered by libremax 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Comme M. Pres. Charles De Gaulle a dit d'autrefois:
Vive le Quebec libre!
2007-01-22 19:37:25 · answer #6 · answered by Marc Miami 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
What in the hell is wrong with Quebec??!! Why are you wearing a rainhat? Why call yourself Tex? Why am I answering this nonsense??
2007-01-22 19:18:27 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
the two. A. W. Tozer defined it terrific for me: "God sovereignly decreed that guy could desire to be unfastened to exercising ethical decision, and guy from the initiating has fulfilled that decree by skill of making his decision between sturdy and evil. whilst he chooses to do evil, he would not thereby countervail the sovereign will of God yet fulfills it, inasmuch because of the fact the everlasting decree desperate no longer which decision the guy could desire to make yet that he could desire to be unfastened to make it. If in His absolute freedom God has willed to furnish guy constrained freedom, who's there to stay His hand or say, “What doest thou?” guy’s will is unfastened because of the fact God is sovereign. A God below sovereign could desire to no longer bestow ethical freedom upon His creatures. He could be afraid to realize this. maybe a homely representation could help us to comprehend. An ocean liner leaves ny certain for Liverpool. Its holiday spot has been desperate by skill of acceptable government. no longer something can exchange it. that's a minimum of a faint image of sovereignty. On board the lining are a number of rankings of passengers. those are no longer in chains, neither are their events desperate for them by skill of decree. they're thoroughly unfastened to go approximately as they are going to. They consume, sleep, play, front room approximately on the deck, study, talk, altogether as they please; yet each and all of the on a similar time as the excellent liner is wearing them progressively onward in direction of a predetermined port. the two freedom and sovereignty are present day right here and that they do no longer contradict one yet another. So that's, i've got self assurance, with guy’s freedom and the sovereignty of God. The solid liner of God’s sovereign layout keeps its secure course over the sea of historic previous. God strikes undisturbed and unhindered in direction of the fulfilment of those everlasting purposes which He purposed in Christ Jesus till now the international began. we don't understand all it extremely is roofed in those purposes, yet adequate has been disclosed to grant us with a huge define of issues to come again and to furnish us sturdy wish and business enterprise coverage of destiny properly being." awareness of the Holy by skill of A. W. Tozer
2016-11-26 20:34:58 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
i doubt it. it should remain a part of canada and conform to the rest of the country.
2007-01-22 19:16:30 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
NO!
Antiques Rock!!
2007-01-22 19:20:41 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋