English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-01-22 17:10:28 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Family & Relationships Marriage & Divorce

I meant to ask if I had a right to claim or it can be something that we can work out so that we both dont claim him.

2007-01-22 17:23:49 · update #1

6 answers

your right, if your on civil terms, its best to agree (every other year for instance) on who claims. if its not in a court order or divorce papers, the IRS will go by time lived with whom and who pays over 50% of the childs expenses.

if you both file, they will audit both of you.

some links to help answers your questions; a few from the IRS on the child support issue.

http://www.taxsites.com/index.htm
http://www.divorceinfo.com/taxes.htm
http://www.irs.gov/taxtopics/tc422.html
http://www.irs.gov/faqs/faq4-5.html
http://www.irs.gov/localcontacts/index.html
http://www.irs.gov/advocate/index.html


on a personal note; on behalf of single mothers out here, thank you for being a stand up parent and paying for your child, as well as being civil.

its rare.

:)

2007-01-26 08:46:53 · answer #1 · answered by Yvette B yvetteb 6 · 0 0

Your brother is the only which knotted up. Joint custody has no longer some thing to do with claiming the youngsters. The IRS tax code states that the be sure who had the youngster more advantageous than 50% of the three hundred and sixty 5 days is the guy who receives to declare the youngsters, inspite of who has custody. as well to, if the mummy did not make a lot money this 3 hundred and sixty 5 days she might want to were eligible for the earned income credit which i trust is $3500 consistent with infant. So she might want to have raked contained in the money for being low income and having youngsters, and on an aspect word infant help isn't considered earned money via the undeniable fact that is technically contained in the youngster's call and the mummy can get food stamps, and all forms of authorities money for no longer operating, or somewhat operating, that's why she would not artwork. that is completely criminal, and substances no incentive to artwork. also, what is going to now happen is that the mummy ought to declare the youngsters as well and the IRS will provide her the EIC and settle for her go back. In about 6 months the IRS receives closer itself and deliver them both a letter declaring that both mothers and fathers claimed the youngsters and now both activities ought to coach who honestly had the youngsters. once the mummy takes out the court docket order declaring she had them for more advantageous than 50% of the three hundred and sixty 5 days the IRS will ask your brother for each of the money decrease back he were given from claiming the youngsters, PLUS pastime. For destiny reference in the adventure that your brother had to declare the youngsters he might want to ought to get type 8332 signed by technique of the mummy and then she does no longer be able to say boo about it, yet as of in the present day he had extra effective amend his taxes and deliver contained in the huge difference and get a tax proffesional in touch quick!

2016-12-02 22:30:11 · answer #2 · answered by rieck 4 · 0 0

One person can claim child for EIC( earned Income Credit) only while the other claims the child as a dependent. This way everybody can benefit about 3,000(max) per tax. You can also file together if that is a possibility ( is your ex fair enough to give you yours?)

2007-01-26 06:02:30 · answer #3 · answered by newyorktilson 3 · 0 0

It depends on who has physical custody of the child. Whoever the child lives with more than 6 months, gets to file

Hope this helps

2007-01-22 17:24:33 · answer #4 · answered by ~ Just Me ~ 5 · 0 0

you dont have joint custody. and you hardly see them so what right do you have. she takes care of them.

2007-01-22 17:23:45 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Not if your ex-wife does.

2007-01-22 17:20:08 · answer #6 · answered by mobilmen59 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers