answers should be in relation to current problms like terrorism, strained relations between countries, countries trying to monopolies others,and other relevant issues
2007-01-22 16:55:34 · 6 answers · asked by renu p 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Not only would anarchy be the state of civilization, but humans by nature, historically want more, & dominate,kill, or imprison those they fear or oppose.
With no restrictions violence would be beyond what you could conceive, & the more elder, infirm, peaceful would be killed as the herd is thinned.
Why do you ask?
2007-01-22 20:58:37 · answer #1 · answered by SantaBud 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Wow. No offense intended, really - but damn! You are TRIPPIN. Are the walls breathing?
What do you think would happen in a world free from any restrictions? Honestly?
2007-01-23 01:09:01 · answer #2 · answered by Jadis 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The world has become a global village and there are no restrictions, only for the privileged class. Not for you and me.
2007-01-23 00:59:45 · answer #3 · answered by liketoaskq 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Imagine all of the taxes that cannot be collected from imports and exports. If we reduced restrictions.
2007-01-23 01:09:46 · answer #4 · answered by eks_spurt 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The question and the explanation don't seem to go together.
2007-01-23 01:00:15 · answer #5 · answered by Brandon 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because that would be anarchy.
2007-01-23 01:05:32 · answer #6 · answered by badgerlicious03 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋