2007-01-22 16:52:40 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
FREEDOM
2007-01-22 17:00:33 · answer #1 · answered by LeAnne 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Hitler was fiscally liberal and socially conservative. His monetary policy was Keynesian to the point of lunacy with a soupcon of Bernie Madoff thrown in, as it had to be to build the war machine the German people as a whole wanted for the war to come. Socially he believed just as today's conservatives that the state has the right to control a woman's body. Like the Republicans he preached family values while making out like a rattlesnake. He rose to power because the capitalists, led by Baron von Krupp, bankrolled him in exchange for his promise to break the unions.
2016-05-23 23:55:15 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Freedom
2007-01-22 16:58:48 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Actually a little fascism might be a good thing. There certainly wouldn't be any terrorism spreading from the Middle East if we had another Hitler in Germany right now.
2007-01-22 16:59:03 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Freedom.
2007-01-22 17:17:19 · answer #5 · answered by twyla_twerp 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
none.
There was no point....or rather, we weren't fighting against fascism. We were fighting to assert our right to not be attacked just because we want to stand on the sidelines during a war and sell weaponry to all sides, getting rich from the deaths of Germans, Japanese, Englishmen, Frenchmen, Italians, Ethiopians, Arabs and Indians. That the guys who chose to attack us were fascists was coincidence, nothing more.
2007-01-22 17:02:02 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Individual freedoms
2007-01-22 17:00:55 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
defense
2007-01-22 16:58:43 · answer #8 · answered by GloryDays49ers 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
oppression
2007-01-22 17:54:04 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
anti-totalitarian
2007-01-22 17:10:24 · answer #10 · answered by robling_dwrdesign 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋