2007-01-22 16:04:24 · 16 answers · asked by angelikabertrand64 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
Well, he is addressing the agenda when he's never done so before.
Too little too late.
2007-01-22 16:10:28 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
I would not say that he would be "stealing" it even if he made it a central issue, though I can't imagine why he would try to anyway. Bush is on his last term, he would not benefit at all from counteracting her position; he will not be running against her in an election. This same set up in 2004, then ya, it would be possible. But as it stands, there would be no advantage to Bush having a leg up on Hilary. She is just a Senator, and it would be a waste of his time. So no.
2007-01-22 16:13:58 · answer #2 · answered by Saint 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Let me refresh your memory, Hillary Clinton was in the White House for 8 years and when she first went in...her promise to everyone was she was going to fix health care. Did that happen? All talk, saying what she thought the people wanted to hear. So you tell us how Bush would be stealing her agenda, she had 8 years and did nothing and that's what she'll do again if she gets in. Nothing!
2007-01-22 16:27:36 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
speaking as a Republican, i imagine that it develop into the perfect-more advantageous S.o.U. I actually have considered in years. i develop into thrilled with the help of the occasional flashes of humor even at the same time as aimed contained in the approach himself. those activities are continuously short on element, it really is the essence of any initiative, yet as a pep communicate it worked ok. i assume that the newly elected residing house majority isn't deterred interior the slightest with the help of what Mr Obama stated, yet contained in the adventure that that they had any doubt about the guy's smarts, they are forewarned.
2016-12-02 22:28:44 · answer #4 · answered by rieck 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hillary NEVER had a HEALTH CARE PLAN all she had was the usual "promise the dupes that they will get "help" or Free medical care..
She should go to England where she can flourish as a socialist and crow about the government managed Health care that doesn't even employ adequate medical personnel to service their entire population...where sickness must be scheduled if there is a medical time slot available
2007-01-22 16:13:06 · answer #5 · answered by ymicgee 3 · 4⤊ 1⤋
Who is "Bushes"?
Have to wait and see. I don't think that Mrs. Bill ever had an original thought so I think your point is moot.
Socialized health care will not work any more that socialism. Why do people think that the industrious should support the lazy?
I just don't get it.
2007-01-22 16:17:57 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Bush's State of the Union will likley be full of hot air. The sad thing is all that hot air wouldnt serve as an alternitave energy resource.
2007-01-22 16:35:44 · answer #7 · answered by divochka79 3 · 0⤊ 3⤋
1) Let's wait till tomorrow night & find out what he says.
2) I'm sure he wants no part of Hillarycare.
2007-01-22 16:31:12 · answer #8 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Her agenda is socialized health care... it is extemely doubtful Bush will promote a plan destined to tank the most successful economy in the history of our country.
2007-01-22 16:07:32 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 4⤋
And what might that be, she's done nothing more in the last fews days but mug for the media. I have yet to hear a word about any issues.
2007-01-22 16:08:29 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋