2007-01-22 15:35:57 · 7 answers · asked by John G 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
1) He has no background in law.
2) I think he is getting senile.
3) He hates America.
So NO!!!!!!!!
2007-01-22 16:32:44 · answer #1 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I think Jimmy Carter would make an excellent Attorney General if they overlook the fact he has no legal background. Otherwise, Jimmy Carter would make an excellent addition to hopefully a Democratic Administration to be elected in 2008. But I feel former President Carter's greatest strength lies in his moral values and expertise in foreign affairs.
2007-01-23 01:12:06 · answer #2 · answered by cliff 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The key word here is attorney. Jimmy Carter is not an attorney. He went to Naval Academy then served 7 years & became a peanut farmer. Then ran for office in GA - served, became President & wrote a bad book & does good chairty work.
He is not a qualified Attorney General even at state level.
2007-01-22 23:45:52 · answer #3 · answered by Wolfpacker 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
What a dumb statement. To be Attorney General, it makes sense that being an attorney is part of the job description. Jimmy Carter is a nuclear engineer & diplomat. Doesn't sound like he matches the position very well, does it?
2007-01-22 23:45:41 · answer #4 · answered by bob h 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
I believe that President Carter is a great humanitarian and a very intelligent man (did you know he has a degree in nuclear engineering?) but he does not perform well in a position that requires difficult decisions. I was around we he was the President and he wasn't very impressive.
2007-01-23 00:22:13 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
He's very old now, but he would be outstanding and the best choice for Attorney General in many, many, many years.
2007-01-22 23:39:35 · answer #6 · answered by The Firebrand Transit 2 · 1⤊ 3⤋
The guy wasn't fit for public office when he was younger.. now that he's old and partially senile.. I'd have to think not.
2007-01-22 23:43:18 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋