Where do you think people are nicer; in country/small towns or city/metropolitian area? Why?
2007-01-22 15:34:48 · 4 answers · asked by rights4everyone 1 in Society & Culture ➔ Other - Society & Culture
Definitely the country/small town group is friendlier to WASPs (white anglo-saxon protestant).
Minorities do better in metropolitan areas.
WHY--because birds of a feather flock together.
2007-01-22 15:37:54 · answer #1 · answered by Dorothy and Toto 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Small metropolitian have nicest people around. Chico, Ca is a ideal small metropolitian along with Eureka, Ca, Rogue River, Or, and other similar city.
Small metropolitian have many cultures in one city, but people are more "small towns" mentally.
2007-01-22 16:31:25 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I prefer to live in a small town. But, I have found very kind and good people in small towns and in citys. I have also found some real idiots in both settings, too. In broad and general terms, small town cultures can tend to be mistrusting of those who are "different" and metropolitan cultures can be more accepting. There are good, kind people in both settings. And, never mind the crime in big citys, some pretty notorius things have happened in small towns.
2007-01-22 15:47:50 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Been to and have lived in both. Give me the people in the small towns or country any time.
2007-01-22 16:24:32 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋