She has more experience than anyone as of having assisted her husband. She is devoted to Health Care and Childens issues. She knows her vote on the war was misdirected by lies. Her Husband would make a Great Secretary of State. Women shouldbe given a chance afterwhay men have done. I do not want to hear about her maritial life that is personnel. Bill got blown and did not blow up people as the ***---- in office now. No Idiots need appy. I do not care f you differ with myopinion just as long as you apply logic.
2007-01-22 15:34:17 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
I would like to hear more challegig answers. Bill Clinton is highly respected throughout the world. Is Bill an additional asset...and be serious.
2007-01-25 02:09:34 · update #1
Ellen you are asking the impossible from any repuglican, you have disallowed all of their arguments, I think she would make a fine president and the only reason I can see not to elect her is to insulate her from the repuglicans built in hate machine.
Edit: I am sure she is up to it though and will handle it well.
2007-01-22 15:39:26 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 4⤋
I AGREE!
HILLARY IS VERY INTELLIGENT IN HER OWN RIGHT!
SHE HAS WON IN NY TWICE AND HAS EVEN SWAYED REPUBLICANS!
SHE WOULD BE A GREAT LEADER. SHE WOULD SAVE THE SOCIAL SECURITY SYSTEM (if it works, why do we have to fix it?) health care for ALL of us, less taxes for the poor single/no exemptions tax payer, higher taxes for those that have millions. She will promote enviromental programs to save this planet! GLOBAL WARMING IS REAL, make no mistake! I live in the southwest and we cannot get rain any longer - we used to!
She hasmy vote, and anyone that works hard for a living, has children, is single, a female, and has HALF A BRAIN will vote for her too!
Go Hillary!
2007-01-30 15:30:01 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because once a month, everything will go to hell.....you know what I mean...
In all seriousness, I don't know if she would make a good president or not. I think our country needs a change and she might be the change we need. I do like the fact she takes a stand on children's issues and I like her thoughts about how to reduce abortions--she says reduce unwanted pregnancies by teaching abstinance and improving the insurance coverage for birth control. Sounds like a swell idea to me.
Only time will tell. There's good and bad in them all...
2007-01-22 15:55:27 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Hillary is not devoted to children's issues. The Goals 2000 program included the picking of a child's future for them. In the lower grades it would be determined who would go on to be trained for college and who would be trained as workers. The training of an elite group as intellectuals and the rest as workers is Socialism. There will be no more American Dream if Hillary is president. We may need a change but we sure don't need Hillary. Remember her Pledge of Allegiance? She said, "I pledge allegiance to the America that can be."
She didn't pledge allegiance to the AMERICA that has given us democracy and freedom, she pledged to the America she intends to create according to her socialist beliefs.
2007-01-28 08:50:00 · answer #4 · answered by book_editor 1 · 2⤊ 1⤋
In my opinion, Hillary's sincerity is suspect. I don't really believe she has the best interests of the American people at heart. I think she cares only for her own professional agenda. She wants to be the first female president. That's simply not good enough to earn my vote. Besides, the privilege of being the first female president belongs to my daughter. She's only twelve now, but by the time she's thirty-five, we should be ready.
2007-01-22 16:47:39 · answer #5 · answered by rtanys 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
She was behind the Monica Lewinsky story. They purposely put that in the limelight to cover-up shredding of documents, abusing their powers and committing purgery. They played with us for 2 years. Her state is Arkansas and that is where she belongs.
2007-01-28 14:06:20 · answer #6 · answered by LindaAnn 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
1 She is as "whatever the people want to hear" as anyone that has ever taken a shot for the office. The Clinton's are ruthless and she is way ahead of Bill in ruthlessness.
2 She is socialistic.
3 I really think she will show her true self before the election.
4 Perhaps she will not be the chosen one for the party.
2007-01-22 15:42:34 · answer #7 · answered by howdigethere 5 · 3⤊ 3⤋
-she isnt trustworthy
-she answers with a reponse that has been calculated to please whatever group she is talking to
-she has a strong belief that ALL things and people can be manipulated
-she has a past tract record of smearing or otherwise actively mounting serch and destroy campaigns against her opponents
(what cant be "found" can be created by innuendo and the press dogs will finish the rip and shred job)
-She would place her personal image and ratings above he good of the country CHAOS would result
-She will self destruct when forced with a hard decision that doesnt instantly produce favorable results.
--She would likely be caught eliminating her detractors or trying to overthrow un-cooperative other "heads" of state
there is much more but my fingers r tired
2007-01-22 16:03:54 · answer #8 · answered by ymicgee 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
She is phoney. She pretends to stand up for women's rights, but then stands by a man who publicly humuliated her. She is for abortion. She uses poor people and minorities for her own gain. She moved to NY after Bill got out of office just so she could get a good "jumping" ground for her own election. If she doesn't think people are aware of this, she's down-right dumb. She is just such a fake! I want a female prez also, but I don't want her. I wanted Condaleeza Rice to run. Someone we can be proud of, not Hillary!
2007-01-22 15:51:30 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
You are totally right about her qualifications. The only thing that would stop her is Bill and I hope that's not enough.
2007-01-22 16:22:59 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋