2007-01-22 15:07:28 · 12 answers · asked by lane_by 1 in Health ➔ Men's Health
no.
2007-01-22 16:02:23 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
When my son was born, I decided against it. In a culture where daily bathing or showering is the norm, it's not necessary. I didn't like the fact that they did it to babies without anesthesia. My thought was if he needs it later for medical reasons, or because he wants it done, at least he will be treated humanely, by having anesthesia.
He's now 17 and says it doesn't bother him.
2007-01-22 23:18:05 · answer #2 · answered by Singinganddancing 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
No, there is no medical or other reason to do the mutilation. Especially not to infants or young boys. It is an archaic, tribal act that does not belong in modern society.
2007-01-23 22:52:58 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Agree,
2007-01-22 23:17:46 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Definately not! Once you go intact...you never go back. Men are much more enjoyable when they are whole :)
2007-01-26 15:01:32 · answer #5 · answered by calngavinsmom 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes, it's much cleaner
2007-01-23 03:03:10 · answer #6 · answered by bad_bob_69 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Its the parent's choice, or theirs when they grow up. Not mine.
2007-01-22 23:15:57 · answer #7 · answered by Donovan G 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
yes
2007-01-22 23:11:12 · answer #8 · answered by gemini93 2 · 1⤊ 3⤋
yes its good
2007-01-22 23:46:22 · answer #9 · answered by mahingsasa 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋
yes,
2007-01-23 04:18:58 · answer #10 · answered by danial rulli 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
No keep that foreskin!
2007-01-23 08:03:49 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋