English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

The Clintons should NEVER be allowed back in the White House for how they trashed it when they left.

2007-01-22 14:39:17 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

17 answers

Well...... Lets consider that the Clinton's ARE liars...... and I'm certainly NOT voting for this Clinton package of lies!

Hillary has high negative ratings. There are a lot of people that REALLY dislike her these are a few of the reasons:

-- Hillary is the liberal media's sweetheart, but not America's sweatheart
-- The Clintons LIE and her husband was impeached for lying and committing purjury
-- Her failed healthcare program under her husband
-- Her shrieking voice that grates on people
-- She doesn't look presidential
-- She is very liberal even more than her husband, but bends (lies) politically to pick up votes and reverts back. This is called a "phony."
-- This would bring her husband back into politics and many people do not like that idea.
-- Her husband also has high negative approval ratings.
-- White Water fraud

We've had almost twenty years of the clinton-bush dynasty. Aren't we ready for a freakin break? If we vote in the shrieking b-i-t-c-h, the dynasty could go to almost THIRTY years. Then Jeb Bush could add another eight years??!

Please, we need a change!!!
.
.

2007-01-22 14:42:42 · answer #1 · answered by charles 3 · 0 5

That story has been proven to be mostly BS

Fox Responds to FAIR

5/25/01

Response from Fox News Channel (5/25/01):


We received several inquiries as a result of an action alert sent out by Fairness and Accuracy In Reporting. As is often the case, FAIR failed to live up to its acronym.

Fox News Channel, like most other major television and print outlets, reported on claims by various sources about supposed trashing of the White House and Air Force One in the last days of the Clinton Administration.

Also like our competitors, we sought reaction from the Bush Administration, which consistently denied that any such vandalism had taken place. Vice President Cheney denied the reports on Fox News Sunday.

On Special Report, our signature political news program, the initial claims were reported in the Grapevine section. Last Friday, the GSA report was also reported in Grapevine.

We hope you'll try actually watching Fox News Channel, rather than copying quotes from FAIR. Then you can decide for yourself whether we live up to our claim of being fair and balanced.

Sincerely,

John Moody
Fox News Channel Senior Vice President, News Editorial

2007-01-22 14:53:17 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

She left the china and took the gold plated silver provider . They took numerous presents from different countries given to america as different Presidents have left for the White homestead. Jackie Kennedy turned right into a appropriate celebration. They were no longer meant for the Clinton library in the experience that they ever confirmed up there. Our treasures. yet, we take as we see and they do and did. definite, I undergo in concepts. yet I wish shall we locate some more suitable links. at present all my Hillary ones were altered. i ask your self why? Senate.gov takes invariably. i began in January this 12 months and now each and each maximum are all lengthy gone. yet, i appreciate analyze and could locate more suitable that they could delete. thanks. * IT shows disrespect and a lack of integrity. something that become actuality thinking this become the first President dis barred at the same time as in workplace. AND a surplus outfitted on the most important volume of deepest debt ever in heritage. Like mortgages and charge playing cards? So if the money is real money or purely paper and revolving it truly become purely words? No disrespect meant purely an change of recommendations. TY

2016-10-15 23:27:46 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The story was totally false. The Clintons did not do anything to harm the white house. It was made up by the dirty Republicans who were getting in their goodbye licks to the Clintons. This is America? Incidentally, I am not a Republican nor am I a Democrat so I have no axe to grind.

2007-01-22 20:01:30 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

See how George Bush destroyed the White House, got us into a war with a country that had nothing to do with 9-11, deserted his own country when we had mass destruction...(Katrina) and is ignoring his own american citizens who helped at the trade center to rescue victims when they are in need of health care...so when he leaves... should he even be allowed to stay in this country? He loves Iraq so much, he should move there after he is kicked out of the white house.
The Bushes should NEVER be allowed back in into this country...they are traitors!

2007-01-22 14:49:11 · answer #5 · answered by Jujuchi 2 · 1 4

Hmmm I was in DC a couple months ago and the Whitehouse was still there.

Did the Government build a new one after the original was destroyed?

Go big Red Go

2007-01-22 14:43:51 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

I remember there being an investigation into the "trashing of the white house". It came up negative.

2007-01-22 14:46:07 · answer #7 · answered by I'll Take That One! 4 · 3 1

Let's see what happens when Bush vacates the premises. There will probably be booze bottles all over the place, holes in the walls, and George Washington's portrait will probably have a mustache drawn on it.

2007-01-22 14:43:48 · answer #8 · answered by Jackson Leslie 5 · 2 2

You are correct. I've thought about this a lot, and I don't believe it's fair for Slick to be able to be in the White House again. He could also be influencing some decisions behind the scenes, like a coach who gets kicked out of a game, but manages to communicate from the locker room.

It's just not fair to put our country through this again. I think that somehow the Constitution should take over if a majority of U.S citizens become so corrupt as to elect people like this who will obviously lead to our downfall, and after they've already caused significant harm. We simply can't become a nation ruled by crazies - people infected with the mental disorder of liberalism.

2007-01-22 14:41:31 · answer #9 · answered by Joseph C 5 · 3 5

Typical RW neonut. The GAO put these rumers to rest years ago. I won't even award you a "nice try" on that old rubbish.

2007-01-22 14:56:01 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers