Why is gravity the most misunderstood when it comes the four forces???

Question

It seems to take an awefull lot of mass for such a soft pull....Thanks for your detailed answer...Tom Science 4

Answer 1

Partly because of the lack of evidence. There has been no quanta associated with gravity (electromagnetic force has photons, for instance). It's also something that can vary wildly under small changes in condition when measuring on Earth, so it can be a hard thing to pin down.

Hey, why do I get all the thumbs down?

Answer 2

i could desire to take a glance however the relationship hangs. pondering you won't be able to replace the suggestions written in, are you able to let us know if the link continues to be valid? [EDIT] that's available now. i'm going to objective to furnish it a sturdy study. thank you for posting the link. [EDIT 2] somewhat truthfully, at approximately internet site eleven my ideas began to wander as i found out "this isn't as insightful as i presumed." I comprehend this probably is a factor of an somewhat technical talk between experts. That Nature has an inclination to do regardless of Gravity dictates, curiously the foremost thesis of the author and the question actually on your call question, purely stops being uncomplicated if we expect of "and how are we going to artwork it out?" the author mindset that we want no microscopic awareness is objectionable: the macroscopic rules for acceptable gases have been profoundly clarified with their kinetic concept (pondering atoms and molecules with speed). you are able to gauge by skill of your self my dissatisfaction with the article in 2 questions: a million) Why is the equivalence concept so darned sturdy? No answer to that, because of the fact the author is merely shuffling the equations around to rederive the equations in accordance to which the thought is valid. 2) what's the inspiration of mass? all of us comprehend it may desire to have some thing to do with the Higgs mechanism, and gravity ought to be in there a fashion or the different too. returned, the author would not answer that because of the fact from the outset his element is that microscopic element is unimportant. i'm no longer qualified to evaluate the technical aspects of the artwork nor how groundbreaking that's. To me even though it would not truly make clean any of the easy questions Physics has nonetheless to handle. thank you for sharing the link, however. [EDIT 3] I could desire to concede i'm sluggish even whilst hit by skill of a truck. "Why is the equivalence concept so darned sturdy" is a man made question by skill of familiar Relativity standards. yet then that's a man made question already by skill of familiar Relativity standards. The artwork does positioned forward a particular connection between Gravity and entropy.

Answer 3

The gravity acts on mass so I suppose it's weak, like nuclear attraction, however acting on a larger distance. For instance, the electromagnectic force attracts over a larger distance, while the nuclear forces do the same, but gravitational forces are only realised when the mass is huge unlike nuclear and electromagnectic forces that act on smaller masses.

Answer 4

I wouldn't say it is misunderstood. But I would say it is the least understood. The fact that it is so much weaker than the other forces is something theorists are desperately trying to understand. I'm afraid we won't be able to answer your question until we DO understand gravity.

Answer 5

Because the understanding of gravity is to have the understanding of the basic structure of matter.