I'm from New York and I hope not...
1. she ran on the promise of creating jobs for New York State.....None were or have been created.
2. What about the FBI files there were found in her closest with her finger prints on them? Oh...She can't recall. Now talk about domestic spying!
3 What political experience does she really have? First Lady and State Senator for less then 2 terms. She has "NO" experience in leadership.
4. White Water!!!
5. She is married to a scum bag and a person who should of been charged with a felony for perjury.
6. Excessive taxes to pay for fantasy social welfare programs.
7. Taking away tax breaks.
Shall I go on??????????
I will give her credit for one thing: She can talk a good talk, but talk is cheap.
2007-01-22 14:04:14
·
answer #1
·
answered by Eldude 6
·
6⤊
1⤋
I think that Hillary Clinton does have a chance at becoming President; she's intelligent and capable, but I don't think she would be the best choice. I think it would be better to break with the rancorous Republican/Bush Democratic/Clinton food fight. It would be better to elect someone who represents a new future, not a repeat of the last sixteen years. Barack Obama, John Edwards, or someone who hasn't yet appeared on the scene would probably be a better choice than Hilliary Clinton. I am a Democrat, but I'm ready for a real change.
2007-01-22 14:15:58
·
answer #2
·
answered by DavidNH 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
She has a chance, although I don't think she is the huge contender the chattering classes say she is. The Republicans want her to run because they have been slandering her for years. She is liked by the wine-and-cheese upper-middle-class- Northeast-and-California-woman crowd, but she's not popular among men. Has anyone ever REALLY run into a man who fervently supported Hillary?
But here's her two biggest weaknesses: 1) She is not supported by the emerging grassroots--the bloggers, MoveOn.orgers and the Jon Stewart-Keith Olbermann audience. They don't like her and they play a bigger role in each successive election. 2) Hillary supported the War in Iraq, and if you think that's a liability now just wait until 2008. It will be political suicide to have been a supporter of the war.
Of course, the 2008 elections are an eternity away in political terms, and who knows how things are going to play out by then.
2007-01-22 14:25:10
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
I do not like hillary clinton as a person, and hope to not ee her in the white house. It is my personal belief that not many women could handle the stress of the job. However, if there is a woman in politics that could do it, i would say it was Condoleeza rice. She has a christian upbringing, and is sound in her morals and standings on issues. I like what she could bring to the table. If she winds up in the running, ill be pulling for her.
2007-01-22 14:07:12
·
answer #4
·
answered by CashMoney 1
·
3⤊
1⤋
No chance. Liberals do not win in national elections. Her husband ran as a moderate, eventhough he was not one.
Look at the last 30 years.
Reagan won on a landslide because he ran as a conservative and Carter was a collosal failure.
Then came Bush. He was VP and a natural replacement. He angered many in the Republican party, who ended up voting for Perot. Clinton won 49%, but won. Bush was not a conservative and he lost because of it.
Then Gore ran as a liberal and lost. Bush ran as a conservative, but has forgotten to act like it. He won reelection because the American people know we have to fight terror and saw Kerry as as the fraud he is.
Newt Gingrich led the Republicans to victory in 1994 with his Contract with America, the second time that Republicans ran as conservatives. Note they won both times.
Liberals never run and win when they run as liberals.
That is why Clinton has no chance. There is way too many sound bites that expose her.
2007-01-22 14:21:09
·
answer #5
·
answered by Chainsaw 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
I am just thinking that maybe its time. She has been in the White House and in politics to know how to handle things and many people might not want a woman, but maybe its time. Fours years can go by pretty quickly, and why not give her a chance, there were so many others who screwed things up, and maybe she could be a good change?????
2007-01-22 14:06:41
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Well since there will be an African American in the running, if you think about it the African American has a better chance. All of the AA's in America would rather have someone to protect their rights... But i will say if Hillary Clinton does get elected, our country will be in trouble b/c other countries will think they can take advantage of her b/c she is a female....But there is a 50-50 chance she will....We will have to wait and see..
2007-01-22 14:07:31
·
answer #7
·
answered by sexycheerleader2009 3
·
0⤊
4⤋
Unfortunately I think she does, partly because people will assume Bill will be back in the white house. I don't like Hillary. I like Obama, but don't think he will win.
2007-01-22 14:16:07
·
answer #8
·
answered by shermynewstart 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
I don't think she does. She is such a polarizing figure and a large number of people in this country despise her. I think that will be very difficult to overcome.
Just a side note here, If she wins the nomination I believe that will pretty much guarantee another republican president. Not saying it is good or bad if that happens, just that I believe it is probable.
2007-01-22 14:06:47
·
answer #9
·
answered by qmstr725 3
·
4⤊
0⤋
I guess she does if enough of you clinton lovers vote for her. How soon you all forget what they did to America's house when they left it. They stole and destroyed.
2007-01-22 14:49:29
·
answer #10
·
answered by Cathy B 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I want her to win, but I doubt she will.
There are too many misogynists in America, lots of catty women and ignorant people in general.
It's easy to be ignorant and lazy thats why there are more of them. Only intelligent people will vote for Hillary,
2007-01-22 14:17:48
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋