Who wants Hilary Clinton for 2008 president?

Question

I sure do. Ever since the first president George Washington, all presidents have been males. Its time for a change, a female president. I think Hilary would be a fabulous president. Not to mention I liked Bill Clinton too when he was in office, and so what if he got a bl ow job. every guy wants one. But anyway I think she could do just as good or even better than Bill. Imagine the first female president and the first wife and husband couple to both have been president at one time. I think she would make America a better place and she would make Bush look even more of a fool than he already does. Plus she is of the Democrat party. Go Hilary for 2008!

Answer 1

After having Bush 4 eight years, I will take anybody. Besides Jeb Bush.

But anyways... Hilary would make a pretty damn good prez. She's done a great job in New York. I know Yankees fans will root 4 her since they only win with democrats in office. But back 2 wats important. A lot of countries have already had women lead them. Israel's first leader, Golda Mier, helped them thru a lot of difficult times and Golda was a woman.

Even though I am a man that hates 2 ask 4 help, I believe Hilary Clinton would make a great candidate in 2008. If she ends up winning the primaries, she is my vote.

Answer 2

The best person for the job is really what we should be looking for. Having a "female" President shouldn't even enter into the equation. Someone with good moral fiber, a high level of intelligence, good judgment, a person who is a good judge of character. Someone who will surround themselves with the best and the brightest advisers.

Sadly, Mrs. Clinton chose a dishonest philanderer for a husband and that left the Mothers and Fathers of America having to explain to their very young impressionable children why the topic of sexual activity in the White house was on the 6:00 news every night. You are obviously not really looking for a serious answer otherwise you would not have made the statement regarding what "every guy wants."

JFK was likely as much or more of a playboy. We will probably never know. The big difference is he was the President of the United States at a time when journalism didn't reach down into the gutter to report the news. Bill Clinton knew he was living in a different time and playing by a whole different set of rules. After all, he was our President, he should have chosen a better path! To put the cherry on top of his bad judgement, he had the audacity to lie about his actions! Please! The man is not dumb and he knew what he was being asked with regard to "sexual relations." I say, stay away! Write your books and collect your money from speaking engagements. Don't bring our country back to moral lowground by moving back into the White house!

Answer 3

In this modern age when our Leadership is slipping and many nations have cunning leaders that are eating our wealth away, we do need a tough and brainy leader who's not as gullible as Bush, or even as weak as Bill Richardson. Poker game playing seems to be what many world leaders are playing. Because of this, I feel that Hillary is definitely the best candidate who is smart enough not to jump in too quick in response, but more likely a leader who'd continue to analyze even when she makes an error. Remember how she stood by Bill Clinton; remember how she found ways to be eligible for being elected as a NY Senator; remember that she went to Iraq to prepare for what she can witness and have first hand knowledge before responding to Bush's New Iraq Plan. I should think she is also surrounded by some of the most briiliant brains of America. And in 2004, when NY was so close to falling into the GOP's majority and with the money the GOPs were pouring into NY city, Kerry won New York City by an overwhelming 73.82% to 22.76% for Bush! Looks like the Nation's Dems can't say that Hillary and the NY Dems hadn't been working hard and had the right strategies.

If anything, Bill Richardson would be the last candidate I'd vote for. New Mexico went to Bush in the 2004 elections. Under Bill Richardson's last 4 years, cime deaths were up. He's all campaign talk and sound bites, but with nothing concrete to cheer about. Remember how Richardson talked about the "Year of the Child"? What he said is mere rip off of Bush's "No Child Left Behind". Remember his $billion dollar rail project (with no known ridership) is proceeding at warp speed, because money will go missing, and costs will overrun and happy days will be here again for some - like those who knew what right-of-ways to buy into. But, teachers won't get decent raises, education money will dry up and the education system never progresses much beyond Mississippi - the bottom benchmark in US educational progress.Richardson also raised hackles in New Mexico in June 2005 when he earned another speeding ticket in his Lincoln Navigator, and earlier when he coaxed the legislature to buy a pricey $5.5 million private jet with leather seats and a wet bar. It was also Richardson who had leaked Wen Ho Lee's name (in the nuclear espionage scandal) to reporters months before the scientist was charged with any crime. He's also a buddy of lobbyists and Wall Street! Oh yes, his negotiations with Dafur also backfired!

Answer 4

Dunno. She's sharp, she's smart, she's a moderate, and it would be great to have a woman president (women are just that much more sensible than men, let's face it). But something about her is a little offputting to me, although I have never met her and might change my mind if I did. She seems a bit too smug (read: high and mighty) for me. She screwed her face up through Bush's entire State of the Union address and did not applaud once (that the cameras were on her), as if to say "Screw you!", regardless of the merits of the speech or lack of them. This is the kind of infantile behavior I would expect from George Bush before the Republicans lost Congress: "I won, you lost, the American people are fools but who cares - hahahaha!". Not like I expect her to nod and grin hypocritically, but at least be gracious and courteous. Childish smugness is more of a male trait, IMHO. She should re-examine her tender, feminine side - it would make her much more attractive as a candidate. There is nothing that says women are not strong - just the opposite. A woman will put herself in harm's way to protect a child much moreso than a man will. It's instinctive.

Answer 5

It's not like our country will be any more a laughing stock to the rest of the world than it is now with Bush in charge. We could elect a tap-dancing circus bear in 2008, and people would say "well, he's still better than the last guy."

Answer 6

To the person who said The United States isn't ready for a Woman President. Period is wrong! Look here, we already have a woman speaker of the House, Pelosi, and so far she is doing good. I think we are ready for a woman president. I'm sick and tired of men taking control of the county. Other countries already have Women Presidents/Prime Ministers. So it's about time we get the program and have a woman president. I think this election is going to change the country. We will have a Mexican, African American and a woman running for President. I think it would be awesome if Barak Obama run for Vice and Hillary run for President. That would be a great combination.

Answer 7

We are already a laughing stock with Bush and as for flushing down the toilet Bush beat her to it. Most of the nos are coming from guys?? What are they afraid of?? Go Hilary!!

Answer 8

Hell yea;HILLARY FOR PRESIDENT.maybe she'll get a ******** in the oval office.You George has gotten one from one of the Cheney daughters;it's becoming like a White house tradition.Man,I'd hate to sit in that chair.aha

Answer 9

Yes, and its high time now to have a woman president. Look at Great Britain, Israel, Philippines, New Zealand. They have at one time of their history a woman leader. And these women are not weaklings. They are all powerful women!

Answer 10

Actually i wouldnt want her as pres cuz i dont think she would do a good job but i wouldnt want obama as pres either so idk.......the u.s. is not ready for a female pres nor is it ready for a black one. but i do think that it is time to get another democrate back into office instead of these f-ing republican's