natural gas boilers v's forced air gas?

Question

which is more efficient for 4000+ sq ft older homes. which would cost the least to operate?

Answer 1

Cost difference may not be as big a factor as comfort. There's nothing like the radiant heat from baseboard or radiators. Nice and gentle, there's a warm presence to the room.

Forced air is so abrupt and can seem suffocating at times.

Downside to water based is that you still need to run air vents if you want central air. If I had the money I'd do both - air vents for the A/C and plumbing for the heat.

Answer 2

First, consider your geographic location. Are you going to need AC to cool in the Summer? Are you North or South? Your choice of Equipment should be mid to high 90% efficency which ever you choose. A Boiler can do more of a spot area due to ease of zoning. Forced air must be zoned carefully to avoid abuse of the heat exchanger. The right contractor should be able to direct you in the right direction for your houses needs. Hope this helps.

Answer 3

Each is quite efficient within today's standards, I suppose. Although, I would concentrate on your home's ability to conceal its heat , once produced. Look for air-leaks , especially coming in through windows, doors, and electrical outlets (believe it or not)

Answer 4

With care and upkeep - it ought to nonetheless be positive. yet often, in case you get 10, 15 or two decades out of one right now, you are able to desire to be content cloth. yet in spite of if the furnace is working positive - the performance of a 1975 sort, whilst in comparison with a 2010 sort would be nighttime and day. In different words, you need to finally end up "saving" the replace value of the hot furnace. inspite of what you elect - make *specific* you have it inspected as quickly as you are able to. you desire no carbon monoxide leaks!